All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: lockdep splat related to wifi regulatory in 3.3.6+
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 15:45:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB6D114.4050802@candelatech.com> (raw)

This appears to be this bug:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734519

Test case was to create 40 (virtual) stations against an AP that can only handle
30, so the remaining 10 constantly try to re-associate, get DHCP if
they manage, etc....


cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: US

======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
3.3.6+ #1 Tainted: G        WC O
-------------------------------------------------------
kworker/1:2/62 is trying to acquire lock:
  (cfg80211_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00f7ced>] restore_regulatory_settings+0x2c/0x4af [cfg80211]

but task is already holding lock:
  ((reg_timeout).work){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8104c5c1>] process_one_work+0x1c2/0x35a

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 ((reg_timeout).work){+.+...}:
        [<ffffffff810799bb>] lock_acquire+0x64/0x81
        [<ffffffff8104e038>] wait_on_work+0x54/0xd3
        [<ffffffff8104e196>] __cancel_work_timer+0xdf/0x128
        [<ffffffff8104e1ec>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0xd/0xf
        [<ffffffffa00f81f5>] reg_set_request_processed+0x4c/0x66 [cfg80211]
        [<ffffffffa00f9675>] set_regdom+0x5f8/0x69f [cfg80211]
        [<ffffffffa01069ab>] nl80211_set_reg+0x213/0x26c [cfg80211]
        [<ffffffff813da541>] genl_rcv_msg+0x1f4/0x239
        [<ffffffff813d921d>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x3e/0x8f
        [<ffffffff813da346>] genl_rcv+0x21/0x28
        [<ffffffff813d8ff8>] netlink_unicast+0xe9/0x152
        [<ffffffff813d9777>] netlink_sendmsg+0x1f8/0x216
        [<ffffffff813a5d3d>] __sock_sendmsg_nosec+0x5f/0x6a
        [<ffffffff813a5d85>] __sock_sendmsg+0x3d/0x48
        [<ffffffff813a662f>] sock_sendmsg+0xa3/0xbc
        [<ffffffff813a6e38>] __sys_sendmsg+0x20f/0x29c
        [<ffffffff813a702e>] sys_sendmsg+0x3d/0x5b
        [<ffffffff8147cd79>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

-> #1 (reg_mutex){+.+.+.}:
        [<ffffffff810799bb>] lock_acquire+0x64/0x81
        [<ffffffff81475319>] __mutex_lock_common+0x64/0x4b5
        [<ffffffff81475851>] mutex_lock_nested+0x36/0x3b
        [<ffffffffa00f8bd3>] reg_todo+0x2d/0x4d7 [cfg80211]
        [<ffffffff8104c622>] process_one_work+0x223/0x35a
        [<ffffffff8104eac5>] worker_thread+0x136/0x255
        [<ffffffff810526be>] kthread+0x84/0x8c
        [<ffffffff8147e1b4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10

-> #0 (cfg80211_mutex){+.+.+.}:
        [<ffffffff81079667>] __lock_acquire+0xade/0xdce
        [<ffffffff810799bb>] lock_acquire+0x64/0x81
        [<ffffffff81475319>] __mutex_lock_common+0x64/0x4b5
        [<ffffffff81475851>] mutex_lock_nested+0x36/0x3b
        [<ffffffffa00f7ced>] restore_regulatory_settings+0x2c/0x4af [cfg80211]
        [<ffffffffa00f818c>] reg_timeout_work+0x1c/0x1e [cfg80211]
        [<ffffffff8104c622>] process_one_work+0x223/0x35a
        [<ffffffff8104eac5>] worker_thread+0x136/0x255
        [<ffffffff810526be>] kthread+0x84/0x8c
        [<ffffffff8147e1b4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
   cfg80211_mutex --> reg_mutex --> (reg_timeout).work

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock((reg_timeout).work);
                                lock(reg_mutex);
                                lock((reg_timeout).work);
   lock(cfg80211_mutex);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by kworker/1:2/62:
  #0:  (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8104c5c1>] process_one_work+0x1c2/0x35a
  #1:  ((reg_timeout).work){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8104c5c1>] process_one_work+0x1c2/0x35a

stack backtrace:
Pid: 62, comm: kworker/1:2 Tainted: G        WC O 3.3.6+ #1
Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff810779a6>] print_circular_bug+0x1ff/0x210
  [<ffffffff81079667>] __lock_acquire+0xade/0xdce
  [<ffffffff8105c5e0>] ? get_parent_ip+0x11/0x42
  [<ffffffff810799bb>] lock_acquire+0x64/0x81
  [<ffffffffa00f7ced>] ? restore_regulatory_settings+0x2c/0x4af [cfg80211]
  [<ffffffff8147af6a>] ? add_preempt_count+0xad/0xb1
  [<ffffffff81475319>] __mutex_lock_common+0x64/0x4b5
  [<ffffffffa00f7ced>] ? restore_regulatory_settings+0x2c/0x4af [cfg80211]
  [<ffffffff81078905>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
  [<ffffffffa00f7ced>] ? restore_regulatory_settings+0x2c/0x4af [cfg80211]
  [<ffffffff81475851>] mutex_lock_nested+0x36/0x3b
  [<ffffffffa00f7ced>] restore_regulatory_settings+0x2c/0x4af [cfg80211]
  [<ffffffffa00f818c>] reg_timeout_work+0x1c/0x1e [cfg80211]
  [<ffffffff8104c622>] process_one_work+0x223/0x35a
  [<ffffffff8104c5c1>] ? process_one_work+0x1c2/0x35a
  [<ffffffffa00f8170>] ? restore_regulatory_settings+0x4af/0x4af [cfg80211]
  [<ffffffff8104eac5>] worker_thread+0x136/0x255
  [<ffffffff8104e98f>] ? manage_workers+0x191/0x191
  [<ffffffff810526be>] kthread+0x84/0x8c
  [<ffffffff8147e1b4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
  [<ffffffff81477fb8>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
  [<ffffffff8105263a>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x56/0x56
  [<ffffffff8147e1b0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
cfg80211: Restoring regulatory settings including user preference


Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


             reply	other threads:[~2012-05-18 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-18 22:45 Ben Greear [this message]
2012-05-19 22:42 ` lockdep splat related to wifi regulatory in 3.3.6+ Eliad Peller
2012-05-21 16:26   ` Ben Greear
2012-05-21 16:48     ` Eliad Peller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FB6D114.4050802@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.