From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from starfish.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.166]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SWT1S-0003jj-MT for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 15:51:42 +0200 Received: (qmail 24805 invoked by uid 1003); 21 May 2012 13:41:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.15?) (philip@opensdr.com@75.136.226.183) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 21 May 2012 13:41:23 -0000 Message-ID: <4FBA4608.6080401@balister.org> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 09:41:28 -0400 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <1336581863-23833-1-git-send-email-philip@balister.org> <4FBA3E04.50403@balister.org> <1337606728.22747.2.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: <1337606728.22747.2.camel@ted> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: Add option to oe-buildenv-internal script to change bitbake location. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 13:51:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/21/2012 09:25 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 09:07 -0400, Philip Balister wrote: >> On 05/09/2012 01:03 PM, Marko Lindqvist wrote: >>> On 9 May 2012 19:44, Philip Balister wrote: >>>> Having bitbake inside the oe-core is annoying to some people. This commit >>>> adds a second option to the oe-init-build-env script. >>>> >>>> Run like this: >>>> >>>> . ./oe-init-build-env ../build ../bitbake >>>> >>>> for example. Without the second option, the old behavior is preserved. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Philip Balister >>> >>> Maybe you should update comment in oe-init-build-env describing >>> typical use to contain this parameter. >> >> Richard, do you want me to se-send this with Marko's suggestions added? > > I'm happy to have a follow up patch, I did merge the original. It broke > various assumptions being made by for example the autobuilder scripts so > I had to add some other changes already. Thanks. I'm curious how it could break things since it should not have had any effect unless a second argument was present. Philip