From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: "Home" of reiser4?
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 19:15:43 +0200
Message-ID: <4FBA783F.1060801@gmail.com>
References: <20410.29101.349635.979177@calefacens.low-entropy.linux.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20410.29101.349635.979177@calefacens.low-entropy.linux.dk>
Sender: reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Markus <mp.lists@free.fr>
Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org

On 05/21/2012 06:47 PM, Markus wrote:
> Hello Edward, Glenn, Viji, Sandro and all other activists,
>

Hello.

> now, that the patches are gone from
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/edward/reiser4/,
> is http://sourceforge.net/projects/reiser4/ now the "official" home
> for further reiser4 development?

Yes.

>
> To which degree is this platform intended to be used {documentation,
> discussions, versioned sources, bug tracking}?

Patches and (maybe) SCM.

I don't see a need to track bugs of current stuff:
any problems are resolved to the old 2-3 bugs that
I am aware of..

>
> Are older patchsets {eg. those still on
> http://130.83.2.34/pub/linux/mirrors/misc/old/reiserfs/reiser4-for-2.6
> and
> http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/kernels/people/edward/reiser4/reiser4-for-2.6/}
> intended to be kept on Sourceforge as well?

Good idea..

>
> Any ideas about authorisation {who may write what}?

Me. And other active reiser4 developers (if any)..

Thanks,
Edward.