From: Chanyeol Park <chanyeol.park@samsung.com>
To: Minho Ban <mhban@samsung.com>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Bluetooth: prevent double l2cap_chan_destroy
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 21:23:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBB8544.3040408@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FBAFEF5.2000207@samsung.com>
Hi
On 2012년 05월 22일 11:50, Minho Ban wrote:
> @@ -1343,10 +1343,10 @@ static void l2cap_conn_del(struct hci_conn *hcon, int err)
> l2cap_chan_lock(chan);
>
> l2cap_chan_del(chan, err);
> + chan->ops->close(chan->data);
>
> l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
>
> - chan->ops->close(chan->data);
> l2cap_chan_put(chan);
> }
I think this patch does not make sense Because inside chan->ops->close()
"chan" could be freed in the l2cap_chan_destroy().
> close callback must locate within chan_lock unless it can be scheduled to other thread
> which may wait for chan_lock in l2cap_sock_shutdown and this lead to duplicate sock_kill.
>
> static void l2cap_sock_kill(struct sock *sk)
> {
> - if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED) || sk->sk_socket)
> + if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED) || sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD) ||
> + sk->sk_socket)
> return;
>
> BT_DBG("sk %p state %s", sk, state_to_string(sk->sk_state));
>
> Duplicate sock_kill may happen anyway, need test SOCK_DEAD if chan_destroy is already called.
Even l2cap_sock_kill() is called twice, " if (!sock_flag(sk,
SOCK_ZAPPED) || sk->sk_socket)" can't filter it.
I tested Mr.ban case. it works fine with me.
BR
Chanyeol Park.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-21 0:56 [RFC/PATCH] Bluetooth: prevent double l2cap_chan_destroy Minho Ban
2012-05-21 16:21 ` Gustavo Padovan
2012-05-22 2:50 ` Minho Ban
2012-05-22 12:23 ` Chanyeol Park [this message]
2012-05-23 1:39 ` Minho Ban
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FBB8544.3040408@samsung.com \
--to=chanyeol.park@samsung.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=mhban@samsung.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.