From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
To: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devel@openvz.org" <devel@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: init client before declaration
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 19:29:31 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBBB0DB.6050708@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337698816.4269.15.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
On 22.05.2012 19:00, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 10:29 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:40 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>>> Client have to be initialized prior to adding it to per-net clients list,
>>> because otherwise there are races, shown below:
>>>
>>> CPU#0 CPU#1
>>> _____ _____
>>>
>>> nfs_get_client
>>> nfs_alloc_client
>>> list_add(..., nfs_client_list)
>>> rpc_fill_super
>>> rpc_pipefs_event
>>> nfs_get_client_for_event
>>> __rpc_pipefs_event
>>> (clp->cl_rpcclient is uninitialized)
>>> BUG()
>>> init_client
>>> clp->cl_rpcclient = ...
>>>
>>
>> Why not simply change nfs_get_client_for_event() so that it doesn't
>> touch nfs_clients that have clp->cl_cons_state!=NFS_CS_READY?
>>
>> That should ensure that it doesn't touch nfs_clients that failed to
>> initialise and/or are still in the process of being initialised.
>
> ...actually, come to think of it. Why not just add a helper function
> "bool nfs_client_active(const struct nfs_client *clp)" to
> fs/nfs/client.c that does a call to
> wait_event_killable(nfs_client_active_wq, clp->cl_cons_state< NFS_CS_INITING);
> and checks the resulting value of clp->cl_cons_state?
>
Sorry, but I don't understand the idea...
Where are you proposing to call this function?
In __rpc_pipefs_event() prior to dentries creatios?
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-22 12:40 [PATCH] NFS: init client before declaration Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-22 13:47 ` Chuck Lever
2012-05-22 14:29 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-22 14:29 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-22 15:00 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-22 15:00 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-22 15:29 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky [this message]
2012-05-22 15:51 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-22 15:51 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-22 16:18 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-22 16:43 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-22 16:43 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-22 20:32 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-22 20:32 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-23 11:30 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-23 12:09 ` Kinsbursky Stanislav
2012-05-23 13:57 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-23 13:57 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-22 15:03 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FBBB0DB.6050708@parallels.com \
--to=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.