From: Alain Renaud <arenaud@sgi.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prefix IO_XX flags with XFS_IO_XX to avoid namespace colision.
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 19:35:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBC22DA.4020500@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120522232424.GK25351@dastard>
On 12-05-22 07:24 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 03:56:21PM -0500, Alain Renaud wrote:
>> This mod simply add a XFS_ prefix to IO_DIRECT,XFS_IO_DELALLOC,
>> XFS_IO_UNWRITTEN and XFS_IO_OVERWRITE. This to avoid namespace conflict
>> with other modules.
> While I don't see any problems with making the change, I don't see
> exactly how we could have a namespace clash here given they are
> internal to XFS, not very widely included and have beenthis way for
> years. What is the namespace clash you are seeing/caring about?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
Hi Dave,
Looking at the XFS code in general we do tend to prefix XFS specific macro
with XFS_ . I did hit the name conflict with one of our internal module I
did fix our module to prefix with the module name but I thought since I did
hit the problem that maybe other people might have the same issue. This is
why I am proposing this mod. it is low priority but I find it is a little
cleaner to have this prefix.
Hope this make sense.
Alain
--
===============================================
Alain Renaud - Cluster File System Engineer
arenaud@sgi.com - SGI
===============================================
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-22 20:56 [PATCH] Prefix IO_XX flags with XFS_IO_XX to avoid namespace colision Alain Renaud
2012-05-22 23:24 ` Dave Chinner
2012-05-22 23:35 ` Alain Renaud [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FBC22DA.4020500@sgi.com \
--to=arenaud@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.