Re: [PATCH 1/4] stmmac: remove two useless initialisation

[Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>]

On 5/23/2012 8:42 AM, David Miller wrote:
> 
> You really need to post your patches properly.
> 
> In particular, you need to indicate, either in an initial "[PATCH 0/N]"
> posting, or in the subject lines of that patch, exactly what tree
> you are targetting.
> 
> And if this is meant for net-next, I told you specifically that net-next
> is not open right now and you need to submit this later when I make
> the announcement here that it is open.
> 
> We are in the middle of the merge window, and therefore you should only
> be submitting bug fixes against the 'net' tree.

Previous ones were for net-next and in fact in the subject I indeed used:

  [net-next X/N] stmmac: ....

After your comment I re-sent them for net.git (pls see my previous email
where I clarified that).

I have always posted all my patches for net-next adding its suffix in
the subject.

For all the patches for net.git I've never added the suffix but I'll do
that.

I agree with you that the suffix should be added and I had understood
(and always used and fixed in my subjectprefix) that these were the
format of the patches in this mailing list

[PATCH] ...        =>>> for net.git
[PATCH net-next]   =>>> for net-next.git

So I'll use starting from now:

[PATCH (net.git)]    =>>> for net.git
[PATCH (net-next)]   =>>> for net-next.git

> It is extremely irritating that, when I go out of my way to make
> announcements here on this list, multiple times, about what kind of
> patches are appropriate and what kinds are not, and yet people still
> do not listen and they still submit any old crap they feel like
> submitting.
> 
> People need to stop this, now.
> 
> Pay attention to the development state, and follow the rules,
> otherwise you'll royally piss me off and I'll ignore your patches
> completely.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
>