From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32159E01363 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 07:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-108-25-187-176.atclnj.east.verizon.net [108.25.187.176]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC2B20EC5BA for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 09:30:06 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4FBE45EC.5040000@mindchasers.com> Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:30:04 -0400 From: Bob Cochran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yocto discussion list Subject: headless yocto linux on Intel? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:30:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, Is it still the case that all Atom solutions have built in video support? So, if I wanted to use Atom for a headless solution, I would have idle video hardware. If this isn't the case, can you please point me to the best Atom solution to run a headless (yocto) Linux embedded system? Thanks, Bob