From: Caspar Zhang <caspar@casparzhang.com>
To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 0/2] move_pages: dont use hardcoded node numbers
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 17:16:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBF4DD9.6090803@casparzhang.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FBF4CE3.30800@redhat.com>
On 05/25/2012 05:12 PM, Jan Stancek wrote:
> Similar to previous patch for mbind01 and get_mempolicy01,
> move_pages tests are also using hardcoded nodes 0/1.
>
> This patch series is introducing get_allowed_nodes() function
> to move_pages_support, which is using
> get_mempolicy(..., MPOL_F_MEMS_ALLOWED)
> to obtain list of nodes tests can use.
>
> I tested it with following setups. Note that setup 4 and 5 will
> end with TCONF as there is only 1 node with memory.
>
> 1.
> # numactl -H
> available: 8 nodes (2,4-10)
> node 2 cpus: 0
> node 2 size: 127 MB
> node 2 free: 9 MB
> node 4 cpus:
> node 4 size: 128 MB
> node 4 free: 9 MB
> node 5 cpus:
> node 5 size: 128 MB
> node 5 free: 64 MB
> node 6 cpus:
> node 6 size: 128 MB
> node 6 free: 121 MB
> node 7 cpus:
> node 7 size: 128 MB
> node 7 free: 121 MB
> node 8 cpus:
> node 8 size: 128 MB
> node 8 free: 121 MB
> node 9 cpus:
> node 9 size: 128 MB
> node 9 free: 121 MB
> node 10 cpus:
> node 10 size: 127 MB
> node 10 free: 123 MB
>
> 2.
> # numactl -H
> available: 4 nodes (0-3)
> node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5
> node 0 size: 2047 MB
> node 0 free: 564 MB
> node 1 cpus: 6 7 8 9 10 11
> node 1 size: 2046 MB
> node 1 free: 451 MB
> node 2 cpus: 18 19 20 21 22 23
> node 2 size: 2048 MB
> node 2 free: 595 MB
> node 3 cpus: 12 13 14 15 16 17
> node 3 size: 2048 MB
> node 3 free: 236 MB
> node distances:
> node 0 1 2 3
> 0: 10 16 16 16
> 1: 16 10 16 16
> 2: 16 16 10 16
> 3: 16 16 16 10
>
> 3.
> # numactl -H
> available: 2 nodes (2-3)
> node 2 cpus: 0
> node 2 size: 511 MB
> node 2 free: 154 MB
> node 3 cpus:
> node 3 size: 511 MB
> node 3 free: 490 MB
>
>
> 4.
> # numactl -H
> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
> node 0 size: 0 MB
> node 0 free: 0 MB
> node 1 cpus:
> node 1 size: 12288 MB
> node 1 free: 9689 MB
> node distances:
> node 0 1
> 0: 10 40
> 1: 40 10
>
> 5.
> # numactl -H
> available: 1 nodes (0)
> node 0 cpus: 0
> node 0 size: 1023 MB
> node 0 free: 654 MB
> node distances:
> node 0
> 0: 10
>
>
> Jan Stancek (2):
> move_pages_support: use only allowed nodes
> move_pages: dont use hardcoded node numbers
>
> .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages02.c | 13 +++-
> .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages03.c | 13 +++-
> .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages04.c | 13 +++-
> .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages05.c | 13 +++-
> .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages06.c | 10 ++-
> .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages07.c | 13 +++-
> .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages08.c | 12 +++-
> .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages09.c | 8 ++-
> .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages10.c | 13 +++-
> .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages11.c | 13 +++-
> .../syscalls/move_pages/move_pages_support.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++----
> .../syscalls/move_pages/move_pages_support.h | 1 +
> 12 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
Looks like many duplications here... wondering if any chance putting
them into a common function or something?
Thanks,
Caspar
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-25 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-25 9:12 [LTP] [PATCH 0/2] move_pages: dont use hardcoded node numbers Jan Stancek
2012-05-25 9:16 ` Caspar Zhang [this message]
2012-05-25 9:33 ` Jan Stancek
[not found] ` <4FBF5672.5090306@redhat.com>
2012-05-25 13:30 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FBF4DD9.6090803@casparzhang.com \
--to=caspar@casparzhang.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.