From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from r-finger.com (r-finger.com [178.79.160.5]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E70E01402 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 04:45:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (host86-170-72-228.range86-170.btcentralplus.com [86.170.72.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by r-finger.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78E9460E52 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 12:45:45 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4FBF70E8.5040802@r-finger.com> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 12:45:44 +0100 From: Tomas Frydrych User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120329 Icedove/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org References: <4FBBB531.8020401@communistcode.co.uk> <4FBBB786.8030501@mlbassoc.com> <4FBBB8E9.1040700@communistcode.co.uk> <20120522163158.GB15020@denix.org> <4FBCA367.701@communistcode.co.uk> <4FBCC147.90606@mlbassoc.com> <4FBCE8E4.6010208@communistcode.co.uk> <4FBE44EE.2070909@communistcode.co.uk> <4FBE4DE9.30501@mlbassoc.com> <1337928496.8248.173.camel@ted> <4FBF7014.8080609@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: <4FBF7014.8080609@mlbassoc.com> Subject: Re: Beaglebone + Poky X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 11:45:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Doesn't 'bitbake -g -u depexp' say what is pulling it in? Tomas On 25/05/12 12:42, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2012-05-25 00:48, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 09:04 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: >>> I agree - there seem to be some recipes in meta-oe that don't play >>> nice with a non-systemd setup like Poky. >>> >>> Note: I was able to boot core-image-minimal built with meta-yocto + >>> meta-oe >>> in all configurations of EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES as long as 'dbg-pkgs' was >>> not specified. As soon as I added that feature, it fails to come up >>> just >>> as you observed. I'm not sure why (and I'm not too motivated to >>> research >>> more, I've already built this thing about 20 times in different ways...) >> >> That is a useful data point to have though, thanks for mentioning it on >> the list! >> >> I wonder if that somehow indirectly pulls in systemd itself? > > It does seem so. I'm not sure what package caused it. The attached > list of files (anything that mentions systemd) might give a clue. > > > > _______________________________________________ > meta-ti mailing list > meta-ti@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti