Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support

["Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>]

On 05/26/2012 12:51 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> It took a while. There were some discussions and we agreed that your
>> > changes establish a better integration with the regulatory framework.
>> > There are some concerns about the content of the crda database, but that
>> > is another thing outside the scope of your patches.
> BTW if you would like to address anything please let me know. If you'd like
> to review things in private too that's fine, just let me know. I
> should say that the staging area for the next generation regulatory
> code is being done through the regulatory simulator:
> 
> git://github.com/mcgrof/regsim.git

Thanks, Luis. I mainly focused on the crda database and it has a
relation freqs<->pwr_limit. In our regulatory code we make a distinction
between 11n and abg as we believe that is necessary. Another example
would be 20MHz transmission in 40MHz channel. Maybe that is taken into
account in crda code, but I did not have a close look at it yet.

I will have a look at the regsim repository and follow up on that.

> Arend, in the future please trim all hunks that are not relevant to
> your replies, that makes review easier.

Will do.

Gr. AvS