From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 5/9] KVM: MMU: introduce SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE bit
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 14:49:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC4716A.8030304@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC470C7.5040700@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This bit indicates whether the spte can be writable on MMU, that means
the corresponding gpte is writable and the corresponding gfn is not
protected by shadow page protection
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 4810992..150c5ad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -145,7 +145,8 @@ module_param(dbg, bool, 0644);
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include "mmutrace.h"
-#define SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE (1ULL << PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT)
+#define SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE (1ULL << PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT)
+#define SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE (1ULL << (PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT + 1))
#define SHADOW_PT_INDEX(addr, level) PT64_INDEX(addr, level)
@@ -1065,32 +1066,43 @@ static void drop_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
rmap_remove(kvm, sptep);
}
+static bool spte_can_be_writable(u64 spte)
+{
+ return !(~spte & (SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE));
+}
+
/* Return true if the spte is dropped. */
-static bool spte_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep, bool *flush)
+static bool
+spte_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep, bool *flush, bool pt_protect)
{
u64 spte = *sptep;
- if (!is_writable_pte(spte))
+ if (!is_writable_pte(spte) &&
+ !(pt_protect && spte_can_be_writable(spte)))
return false;
rmap_printk("rmap_write_protect: spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);
- *flush |= true;
if (is_large_pte(spte)) {
WARN_ON(page_header(__pa(sptep))->role.level ==
PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL);
+
+ *flush |= true;
drop_spte(kvm, sptep);
--kvm->stat.lpages;
return true;
}
+ if (pt_protect)
+ spte &= ~SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE;
spte = spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
- mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
+
+ *flush = mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
return false;
}
-static bool
-__rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp, int level)
+static bool __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
+ int level, bool pt_protect)
{
u64 *sptep;
struct rmap_iterator iter;
@@ -1098,7 +1110,7 @@ __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp, int level)
for (sptep = rmap_get_first(*rmapp, &iter); sptep;) {
BUG_ON(!(*sptep & PT_PRESENT_MASK));
- if (spte_write_protect(kvm, sptep, &flush)) {
+ if (spte_write_protect(kvm, sptep, &flush, pt_protect)) {
sptep = rmap_get_first(*rmapp, &iter);
continue;
}
@@ -1127,7 +1139,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
while (mask) {
rmapp = &slot->rmap[gfn_offset + __ffs(mask)];
- __rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmapp, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL);
+ __rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmapp, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, false);
/* clear the first set bit */
mask &= mask - 1;
@@ -1146,7 +1158,7 @@ static bool rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gfn)
for (i = PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL;
i < PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL + KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES; ++i) {
rmapp = __gfn_to_rmap(gfn, i, slot);
- write_protected |= __rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmapp, i);
+ write_protected |= __rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmapp, i, true);
}
return write_protected;
@@ -2284,8 +2296,10 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
spte |= shadow_x_mask;
else
spte |= shadow_nx_mask;
+
if (pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK)
spte |= shadow_user_mask;
+
if (level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
spte |= PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK;
if (tdp_enabled)
@@ -2310,7 +2324,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
goto done;
}
- spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
+ spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE;
if (!vcpu->arch.mmu.direct_map
&& !(pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK)) {
@@ -2339,8 +2353,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
__func__, gfn);
ret = 1;
pte_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
- if (is_writable_pte(spte))
- spte &= ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
+ spte &= ~(PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE);
}
}
@@ -3921,7 +3934,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
!is_last_spte(pt[i], sp->role.level))
continue;
- spte_write_protect(kvm, &pt[i], &flush);
+ spte_write_protect(kvm, &pt[i], &flush, false);
}
}
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-29 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-29 6:46 [PATCH v6 0/9] KVM: MMU: fast page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-05-29 6:47 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] KVM: MMU: return bool in __rmap_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2012-05-29 6:47 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] KVM: MMU: abstract spte write-protect Xiao Guangrong
2012-05-29 6:48 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] KVM: VMX: export PFEC.P bit on ept Xiao Guangrong
2012-05-29 6:48 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] KVM: MMU: fold tlb flush judgement into mmu_spte_update Xiao Guangrong
2012-05-29 6:49 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-06-11 23:32 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] KVM: MMU: introduce SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE bit Marcelo Tosatti
2012-06-12 2:23 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-13 2:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-06-13 3:11 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-13 21:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-06-14 1:13 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-06-14 2:41 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-14 2:36 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-05-29 6:50 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] KVM: MMU: fast path of handling guest page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-13 22:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-06-14 1:22 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-06-18 19:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-06-19 2:07 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-06-14 3:00 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-18 19:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-06-19 2:04 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-05-29 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] KVM: MMU: trace fast " Xiao Guangrong
2012-05-29 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] KVM: MMU: fix kvm_mmu_pagetable_walk tracepoint Xiao Guangrong
2012-05-29 6:52 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] KVM: MMU: document mmu-lock and fast page fault Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC4716A.8030304@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.