From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Stop accepting SCSI requests before removing a device
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 12:35:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC508D2.7040606@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC4E492.1000707@acm.org>
On 05/29/2012 10:00 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 05/05/12 13:04, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>
>> Now that we're looking at potential device removal races: since the host
>> lock push down scsi_dispatch_cmd() is invoked while a reference on the
>> device is hold but without holding the host lock or the device queue lock.
>> Shouldn't we make sure that invoking the SCSI device tear down code only
>> occurs once it is sure that hostt->queuecommand won't be invoked anymore ?
>
>
> (replying to my own e-mail)
>
> The patch below makes sure that blk_drain_queue() and blk_cleanup_queue()
> wait until all queuecommand invocations have finished and hence fixes a
> race between the SCSI error handler and __scsi_remove_device(). Any feedback
> is welcome.
>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> index 386f0c5..947f627 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> @@ -781,10 +781,17 @@ static int scsi_send_eh_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, unsigned char *cmnd,
> struct scsi_device *sdev = scmd->device;
> struct scsi_driver *sdrv = scsi_cmd_to_driver(scmd);
> struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
> + struct request_queue *q = sdev->request_queue;
> DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(done);
> unsigned long timeleft;
> struct scsi_eh_save ses;
> - int rtn;
> + int rtn = FAILED;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> + if (blk_queue_dead(q))
> + goto out_unlock;
> + q->rq.count[BLK_RW_SYNC]++;
> + spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
Are you hitting a case where a scsi_cmnd does not have a request struct
that was allocated through the block layer functions like
blk_get_request, but is getting sent through this path? What code is
doing this?
Or, are you hitting a bug where somehow the request is freed (so the
rq.count is decremented) but the scsi eh is still working on a scsi_cmnd
that had a request struct allocated for it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-29 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-04 15:00 [PATCH 0/3 v6] Fixes for SCSI device removal Bart Van Assche
2012-05-04 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] sd: Fix device removal NULL pointer dereference Bart Van Assche
2012-05-04 15:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] Stop accepting SCSI requests before removing a device Bart Van Assche
2012-05-04 20:16 ` Mike Christie
2012-05-04 20:30 ` Mike Christie
2012-05-05 13:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-05-29 15:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-05-29 17:35 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2012-05-30 6:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-05-30 17:27 ` Mike Christie
2012-05-30 20:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-06-01 3:13 ` Mike Christie
2012-05-04 15:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] Make scsi_free_queue() abort pending requests Bart Van Assche
2012-05-04 20:25 ` Mike Christie
2012-05-04 20:32 ` Mike Christie
2012-05-05 6:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-05-07 0:44 ` Mike Christie
2012-05-07 1:15 ` Mike Christie
2012-05-14 18:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-05-29 14:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-05-05 13:41 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC508D2.7040606@cs.wisc.edu \
--to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=thenzl@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.