From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Priebe Subject: Re: poor OSD performance using kernel 3.4 Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 23:04:41 +0200 Message-ID: <4FC539E9.4020403@profihost.ag> References: <5970d59f-9531-4f60-8600-3e1268824c83@mailpro> <4FC49B12.8020004@profihost.ag> <4FC4D1A8.1080001@univ-nantes.fr> <4FC4E0A9.8010008@profihost.ag> <4FC50C4A.4090101@inktank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.profihost.ag ([85.158.179.208]:49579 "EHLO mail.profihost.ag" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754735Ab2E2VEp (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2012 17:04:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FC50C4A.4090101@inktank.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Nelson Cc: Yann Dupont , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Am 29.05.2012 19:50, schrieb Mark Nelson: > Once I get these nodes up to 0.47 and get them switched over to 10GbE > I'll redo the btrfs tests and try out xfs as well with longer running > tests. I always test on 1GE and see this proble no matter whether btrfs or xfs. So i think this is just a waste of time. At least my test differ as i see this problem on ALL pools. Mark should i try 0.46? Thanks, Stefan