From: Karandeep Chahal <kchahal@ddn.com>
To: David Dillow <dillowda@ornl.gov>
Cc: "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"roland@kernel.org" <roland@kernel.org>,
"sean.hefty@intel.com" <sean.hefty@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ib_srp: Infiniband srp fast failover patch.
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 10:39:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC63132.60609@ddn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338354377.2361.13.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org>
Hi Dave,
As long as we get faster failover I am happy with Bart's patch.
Currently when I run IO to several luns over multipath and the preferred
path goes down, the system hangs until the IO fails over. Even ssh'ing
into the systems take 20-30 seconds. I *suspect* that is because IO is
being queued up somewhere which brings the whole system to its knees.
Thank you for looking at the patch.
Thanks
Karan
On 05/30/2012 01:06 AM, David Dillow wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 17:07 -0400, Karandeep Chahal wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH] Infiniband srp fast failover patch.
> This conflicts with Bart's patches to improve failover; it will be much
> better to use his approach to block the target rather than remove it
> wholesale -- we could have lost connectivity as a transient and may get
> it back quickly if someone grabbed the wrong cable, etc.
>
> Also, we should only kill the one target on DREQ, and we already have a
> pointer to it from the CM context -- no need to search.
>
> It is a good idea to hook into the event mechanism; this is something
> I've long wanted to incorporate (as Vu did in OFED). I'm looking at
> getting Bart's series to a point I can merge it, and I'll pull in your
> ideas -- with credit -- there.
>
> Thanks,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-30 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-29 21:07 [PATCH 1/1] ib_srp: Infiniband srp fast failover patch Karandeep Chahal
2012-05-29 21:51 ` Michael Reed
2012-05-29 22:27 ` Karandeep Chahal
[not found] ` <4FC54D62.3080003-LfVdkaOWEx8@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-29 22:53 ` Michael Reed
2012-05-29 22:53 ` Michael Reed
[not found] ` <4FC53AAA.3060203-LfVdkaOWEx8@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-30 5:06 ` David Dillow
2012-05-30 5:06 ` David Dillow
2012-05-30 14:39 ` Karandeep Chahal [this message]
[not found] ` <1338354377.2361.13.camel-1q1vX8mYZiGLUyTwlgNVppKKF0rrzTr+@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-12 23:10 ` Or Gerlitz
[not found] ` <CAJZOPZL0cj6Sb_xs7prV0k8HjWkELD7Y89Bxxp-xXnnGqxvXyg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-12 23:46 ` Karandeep Chahal
[not found] ` <50A18A3D.9070304-LfVdkaOWEx8@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-13 21:07 ` Or Gerlitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC63132.60609@ddn.com \
--to=kchahal@ddn.com \
--cc=dillowda@ornl.gov \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.