From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: there's no cxsr on ilk
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 12:19:22 -0300
Message-ID: <4FC63A7A.6060605@linux.intel.com>
References: <1338390945-7226-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reply-To: eugeni.dodonov@intel.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6084E9E747
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Wed, 30 May 2012 08:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1338390945-7226-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On 05/30/2012 12:15 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Already discovered in
>
> commit 5a117db77e47e3946d1aaa7ce8deafafd9d76746
> Author: Eugeni Dodonov<eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
> Date:   Thu Jan 5 09:34:29 2012 -0200
>
>      drm/i915: there is no pipe CxSR on ironlake
>
> but we've failed to rip out the code from the ironlake specific code.
>
> Cc: Eugeni Dodonov<eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
> Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter<daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>

The code newer got called anyway since the last patch, so let's put it 
to rest.