From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4FC63C53.3020805@xenomai.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 17:27:15 +0200
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKKWdtc6Py7A9YuJ1nNzwmq0SiEcrP_D8pztoo_eNWsp9EAsFg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FC637EB.90908@xenomai.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FC637EB.90908@xenomai.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] a question about ADEOS
List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/options/xenomai>,
	<mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai>,
	<mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org

On 05/30/2012 05:08 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 04:35 PM, ali hagigat wrote:
>> I know that adeos project presents an API set. It means some functions
>> mostly which start with adeos_.
>> Why adeos patch does not add them to the linux kernel?
> 
> I don't understand your question.

If the question is: why is not Adeos integrated in the mainline kernel ?
the answer is that the kernel community has chosen another solution to
enable real-time, and is not interested in integrating the Adeos patch.

-- 
					    Gilles.