All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ludovic.desroches@atmel.com (ludovic.desroches)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Remove at91 workaround from handle_IRQ
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 10:21:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC72A04.3040504@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338449901-10288-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>

Hi Will,

Le 05/31/2012 09:38 AM, Will Deacon a ?crit :
> Hello,
>
> This is a couple of patches that I wrote quickly to try and remove the
> irq_finish hook from handle_IRQ on ARM. Currently, the hook is only used
> by at91 in order to issue an EOI when using level_irq flow control.
>
> This patch moves the at91 irq_chip to fasteoi flow control, removing the
> need for the additional hook. Since I (a) don't know anything about at91
> (the TRM I found for the IRQ controller is only a few pages long) and (b)
> don't have a platform on which to test, this is very much an RFC series.
>
> All comments welcome.
>
> Will

I have sent a patch with the same purpose a few days ago: 
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/169371

The content of our patches is really close:
- I missed the remove of irq_finish macro in arch/arm/irq/kernel.c
- AIC don't care about the value written into AT91_AIC_EOICR, I don't 
know if it's better to write 0 or a precise value as you did.
- I didn't remove irq_ack but you're right it's no more useful.
- You missed gpio part, it has to use fasteoi flow control also.

I have also to remove some comments so I can send a second version and 
add what I missed the first time if you have no objections.


> Cc: Arnd Bergmann<arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard<plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
> Cc: Nicolas Ferre<nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
>
> Will Deacon (2):
>    ARM: at91: use EOI flow control for interrupt handling
>    ARM: irq: remove unused irq_finish hook from core interrupt handling
>
>   arch/arm/kernel/irq.c                  |   10 ----------
>   arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/irqs.h |    8 --------
>   arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c               |   12 +++++++++---
>   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>

Regards

Ludovic

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-31  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-31  7:38 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Remove at91 workaround from handle_IRQ Will Deacon
2012-05-31  7:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] ARM: at91: use EOI flow control for interrupt handling Will Deacon
2012-05-31  7:38 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] ARM: irq: remove unused irq_finish hook from core " Will Deacon
2012-05-31  8:21 ` ludovic.desroches [this message]
2012-05-31  8:31   ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Remove at91 workaround from handle_IRQ Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FC72A04.3040504@atmel.com \
    --to=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.