From: Joanna Rutkowska <joanna@invisiblethingslab.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Marek Marczykowski <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Noticeably poor Intel GPU performance on 3.3 and 3.4 dom0 kernels
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 11:15:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC73697.20509@invisiblethingslab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC614770200007800086D0C@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1416 bytes --]
On 05/30/12 12:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 30.05.12 at 12:14, Joanna Rutkowska <joanna@invisiblethingslab.com> wrote:
>> > I've recently been some newer Dom0 kernels (3.3.5, 3.4) under Xen 4.1.2,
>> > and have noticed that those kernel noticeably downgrade performance of
>> > (at least) Intel GPUs. This is easily noticeable even on such trivial
>> > tasks as scrolling a webpage in Firefox or Chrome. This slow GPU
>> > performance on 3.3 and 3.4 kernels is in stark contrast with what I see
>> > on 3.2.7 Dom0 kernel, where graphics works just great...
>> >
>> > In order to make sure that this is not caused by power management set
>> > too strictly, I played with xenpm and made sure to set the following:
>> > 1) xenpm set-scaling-governor performance
>> > 2) xenpm set-max-cstate 0
>> >
>> > I have verified then that my processor: 1) keeps staying in P0 state
>> > (so, max frequency), and 2) keeps staying in C0 state.
>> >
>> > Those setting didn't change anything regarding the poor graphics
>> > performance, though.
>> >
>> > Any ideas what else I could test to find out the cause of this?
> To check whether the DRM drivers' supposedly more extensive
> use of the DMA API is the reason, could you check whether the
> performance is as bad with "mem=4G" on the Xen command line?
With mem=4G xen option, the graphics performance is just as poor as without.
joanna.
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-31 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-30 10:14 Noticeably poor Intel GPU performance on 3.3 and 3.4 dom0 kernels Joanna Rutkowska
2012-05-30 10:37 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-31 9:15 ` Joanna Rutkowska [this message]
2012-05-30 14:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-30 14:57 ` Marek Marczykowski
2012-05-30 21:21 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC73697.20509@invisiblethingslab.com \
--to=joanna@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.