All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: Optimize vcpu->requests slow path slightly
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 12:27:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC7396D.7050803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120530200334.GA23297@amt.cnet>

On 05/30/2012 11:03 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 04:49:27PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Instead of using a atomic operation per active request, use just one
>> to get all requests at once, then check them with local ops.  This
>> probably isn't any faster, since simultaneous requests are rare, but
>> it does reduce code size.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |   33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 953e692..c0209eb 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -5232,55 +5232,58 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  	bool req_int_win = !irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) &&
>>  		vcpu->run->request_interrupt_window;
>>  	bool req_immediate_exit = 0;
>> +	ulong reqs;
>>  
>>  	if (unlikely(req_int_win))
>>  		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
>>  
>>  	if (vcpu->requests) {
>> -		if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_MMU_RELOAD, vcpu))
>> +		reqs = xchg(&vcpu->requests, 0UL);
>> +
>> +		if (test_bit(KVM_REQ_MMU_RELOAD, &reqs))
>>  			kvm_mmu_unload(vcpu);
>> -		if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_MIGRATE_TIMER, vcpu))
>> +		if (test_bit(KVM_REQ_MIGRATE_TIMER, &reqs))
>>  			__kvm_migrate_timers(vcpu);
>> -		if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu)) {
>> +		if (test_bit(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, &reqs)) {
>>  			r = kvm_guest_time_update(vcpu);
>>  			if (unlikely(r))
>>  				goto out;
>>  		}
> 
> Bailing out loses requests in "reqs". 


Whoops, good catch.

> 
> Caching the requests makes the following type of sequence behave strangely
> 
> req = xchg(&vcpu->requests);
> if request is set
>     request handler
>         ...
>         set REQ_EVENT
>         ...
> 
> prepare for guest entry
> vcpu->requests set
>     bail


I don't really mind that.  But I do want to reduce the overhead of a
request, they're not that rare in normal workloads.

How about


   for_each_set_bit(req, &vcpu->requests, BITS_PER_LONG) {
       clear_bit(bit, &vcpu->requests);
       r = request_handlers[bit](vcpu);
       if (r)
             goto out;
   }

? That makes for O(1) handling since usually we only have one request
set (KVM_REQ_EVENT).  We'll make that the last one to avoid the scenario
above.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-31  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-20 13:49 [PATCH v2 0/3] Minor vcpu->requests improvements Avi Kivity
2012-05-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: Simplify KVM_REQ_EVENT/req_int_win handling Avi Kivity
2012-05-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: Optimize vcpu->requests slow path slightly Avi Kivity
2012-05-30 20:03   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-05-31  9:27     ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-06-02  0:23       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-05-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: Move mmu reload out of line Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FC7396D.7050803@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.