From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86: Reset the debug_stack update counter
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 12:19:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC7C43B.3070106@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120531020441.165841749@goodmis.org>
On 05/30/2012 06:28 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c index
> 9087527..c1fffc5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c +++
> b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c @@ -450,8 +450,10 @@ static inline void
> nmi_nesting_preprocess(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> static inline void nmi_nesting_postprocess(void) { - if
> (unlikely(__get_cpu_var(update_debug_stack))) + if
> (unlikely(__get_cpu_var(update_debug_stack))) {
> debug_stack_reset(); + __get_cpu_var(update_debug_stack) = 0; + }
> } #endif
>
Please don't use __get_cpu_var(); it causes a pointer to be manifest,
which is free or almost free on most architectures but quite expensive
on x86.
Instead use this_cpu_read()/this_cpu_write().
Consider:
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, percpu_test);
int read_foo(void)
{
return __get_cpu_var(percpu_test);
}
void write_foo(int x)
{
__get_cpu_var(percpu_test) = x;
}
int read_bar(void)
{
return this_cpu_read(percpu_test);
}
void write_bar(int x)
{
this_cpu_write(percpu_test, x);
}
... and the corresponding assembly code (with gcc boilerplate removed):
read_foo:
movq $percpu_test, %rax #, tcp_ptr__
add %gs:this_cpu_off, %rax # this_cpu_off, tcp_ptr__
movl (%rax), %eax # *D.8429_3, *D.8429_3
ret
write_foo:
movq $percpu_test, %rax #, tcp_ptr__
add %gs:this_cpu_off, %rax # this_cpu_off, tcp_ptr__
movl %edi, (%rax) # x, *D.8435_3
ret
read_bar:
movl %gs:percpu_test,%eax # percpu_test, pfo_ret__
write_bar:
movl %edi,%gs:percpu_test # x, percpu_test
ret
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-31 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-31 1:28 [PATCH 0/5] [GIT PULL] ftrace: Fix bug with function tracing and lockdep Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 1:28 ` [PATCH 1/5] ftrace: Synchronize variable setting with breakpoints Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 14:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 15:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-05-31 15:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 18:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 17:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 17:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 18:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 18:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 19:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 19:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-05-31 20:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 20:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 20:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-01 4:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-06-01 11:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-01 12:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-06-01 0:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-31 1:28 ` [PATCH 2/5] ftrace: Use breakpoint method to update ftrace caller Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 14:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 1:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: Reset the debug_stack update counter Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 19:19 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-05-31 19:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 1:28 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow nesting of the debug stack IDT setting Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 18:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 18:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 19:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 19:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 20:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 20:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 20:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 20:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 21:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-31 21:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 21:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-01 2:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 1:28 ` [PATCH 5/5] ftrace/x86: Do not change stacks in DEBUG when calling lockdep Steven Rostedt
2012-05-31 2:13 ` [PATCH 0/5] (for 3.5)[GIT PULL] ftrace: Fix bug with function tracing and lockdep Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC7C43B.3070106@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.