From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B700E0044A; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:37:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q513bsx3013195 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 31 May 2012 20:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bruce-ashfields-macbook.local (128.224.20.180) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Thu, 31 May 2012 20:37:54 -0700 Message-ID: <4FC83910.9050302@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 23:37:52 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darren Hart References: <4FC009CD.9030201@yoctoproject.org> <4FC7B80E.1020802@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4FC7B80E.1020802@linux.intel.com> Cc: Yocto Project Discussion , yocto-infrastructure@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Bugzilla Re-organization X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 03:37:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12-05-31 2:27 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > > > On 05/25/2012 03:38 PM, Michael Halstead wrote: >> The first draft of the reorganized bugzilla is available for feedback >> now at https://bugzilla.yoctodev.org/. Outgoing e-mail is currently >> disabled on this preview copy. Please feel free to take a look and see >> if you spot any errors. Additional refinement of product or component >> descriptions will be helpful as well. >> > > It seems to me one should be able to find the linux-yocto kernel itself > under the Yocto Project Components from the basic search page. Currently > there is Kernel Tooling and BSPs, but there are times when the bug is > not BSP specific and is in the kernel itself, not the tooling. For this, > a hierarchy like the following might be preferable: > > Yocto Project Components > BSPs > bsps > Kernel > linux-yocto > configuration > kernel-tooling +1. I completely agree with this. > > I am still not sure how best to deal with BSPs here and BSPs in Build > System& Metadata. I think We should pick one or the other as the > distinction between the two is non-obvious (actually I have no idea what > it would be). Agreed .. that this is hard. If we used 'configuration' for the kernel category, could the build system + meta data fall into that as well under BSPs ? i.e. BSPs bsps - runtime bsps - configuration ? Bruce > > Tom, Bruce: opinions on the above? > > > "Build System& Metadata" and "Yocto Metadata Layers" use different > naming schemes for the components in the various layers products. Some > use meta- others do not. > >