From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx-3.enea.com (sestofw01.enea.se [192.36.1.252]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7C89E01435 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 03:34:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.140.132] (172.16.140.132) by smtp.enea.com (172.21.1.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:34:09 +0200 Message-ID: <4FC89AB1.40706@enea.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:34:25 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?RGF2aWQgTnlzdHLDtm0=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Khem Raj References: <4FC74DF9.3070401@enea.com> In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [172.16.140.132] Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: PR and bbappends X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:34:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/31/2012 04:01 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:54 AM, David Nystr=C3=B6m wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Is there a good way to get the layer name ?, I want to add >> PR .=3D "+${LAYER_NAME}.0" to my bbappends for clarity and versioning wh= en >> having multiple meta layers. >> Where a bbappend:s on package X can reside in one, two or more layers. >> > you could look into bitbake-layers tool > bitbake-layers show-overlayed will show the recipes overlays > if thats the problem you are trying to solve > Thanks, I was unaware of that script. But not really want I want to do. We are going to have multiple BSP layers sourced from BSP suppliers, and=20 customer specific layers on top of this. When it comes to testing, we want our test-objects(binary packages) to=20 differ depending on which layers appended them, so that we can easily automate a testing procedure, and reduce possible=20 permutations of testobjects.(For unit testing). Also, when you see bash_4.2-r2+meta-fsl-ppc.0+meta-ti.2_ppce500mc.ipk,=20 you directly see who manipulated the contents of the bash package. And where eventual failures could originate from. >> Best Regards, >> David >> >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto