Re: [PATCHv3 0/3] trace: improve hypercall tracing

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>]

On 31/05/12 15:32, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 31/05/12 15:21, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:06 PM, David Vrabel<david.vrabel@citrix.com>  wrote:
>>> These are probably for 4.3.
>> Thanks for doing these, David.
> Thanks for the review.
>
>> I wouldn't oppose these going into 4.2;  but it is getting awfully
>> late.  (I acked them "4.2-only" just to flag that up to the
>> committers.)
> I think they should be for 4.3 -- there's more important things needing
> to be merged into 4.2.
>
>> BTW, what did you use to send these patches?  Any chance you could use
>> "hg email" (or the git equivalent if you're using git) instead?  It
>> makes it a lot easier for me to integrate them into my review
>> workflow. :-)
> I did use git send-email.  What's the problem with the series? I can see
> if there options I could turn on that would help.
Curious.  I'm not exactly sure; just that the tool I use to trawl a 
gmail folder looking for patch series (hg mimport) for some reason 
identified it as 3 independent patches (and I think put them in the 
wrong order), rather than a single 3-patch series.

Maybe someday I'll take a look and figure out what went wrong.

  -George