From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A36DE00747 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:58:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-108-25-202-159.atclnj.east.verizon.net [108.25.202.159]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3C42104A6D; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 16:58:11 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4FC93AF2.2090102@mindchasers.com> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:58:10 -0400 From: Bob Cochran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: McClintock Matthew-B29882 References: <4FC90484.6010007@mindchasers.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: Poky Project Subject: Re: best way to purge stale packages? X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:58:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/01/2012 03:27 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Bob Cochran wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Inside my work directory, I have three versions of openssl: >> openssl-1.0.0i-r15.2, openssl-1.0.0i-r0.1, and openssl-1.0.0h-r15.1, with >> the latter two being stale. I also have artifacts from these stale packages >> in tmp/stamps. >> >> I haven't come along a bitbake option or ancillary script to remove stale >> packages as my recipes bump. Is there one? > > ./scripts/cleanup-workdir ? > > -M > Thanks Matthew. I didn't notice that was added back in March. Very cool. I'm going to read through the source before trying since I see that Andreas sent out an email on 4/12 on the OE list pointing out a few problems he had. I'll report back if I get good results or not. I have been working from the same build directory for a couple of months from the master branch, so my build dir should be a decent test case. Thanks again, Bob