From: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
To: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xudong.hao@linux.intel.com,
yu.zhao@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] PCI: Remove redundant capabilities checking in pci_{save, restore}_pcie_state
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:00:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC93B90.1010907@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120601211643.20328.26918.stgit@amt.stowe>
On 06/01/2012 05:16 PM, Myron Stowe wrote:
> Unlike PCI Express v1's Capabilities Structure, v2's requires the entire
> structure to be implemented. In v2 structures, register fields that are
> not necessarly implemented, are present but hardwired to 0x0. These may
> include: Link Capabilities, Status, and Control; Slot Capabilities,
> Status, and Control; Root Capabilities, Status, and Control; and all of
> the '2' (Device, Link, and Slot) Capabilities, Status, and Control
> registers.
>
> This patch removes the redundant capability checks corresponding to the
> Link 2's and Slot 2's, Capabilities, Status, and Control registers as they
> will be present if Device Capabilities 2's registers are (which explains
> why the macros for each of the three are identical).
>
> Signed-off-by: Myron Stowe<myron.stowe@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 26933ff..f9f8036 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -903,12 +903,11 @@ static int pci_save_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL,&cap[i++]);
> if (pcie_cap_has_rtctl(dev->pcie_type, flags))
> pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_RTCTL,&cap[i++]);
> - if (pcie_cap_has_devctl2(dev->pcie_type, flags))
> + if (pcie_cap_has_devctl2(dev->pcie_type, flags)) {
and why not use your new function:
+ pos = pci_pcie_cap2(bridge);
+ if (!pos)
instead of this devctl2-specific check, so it's obvious it's the whole cap-struct (additional regs)?
> pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,&cap[i++]);
> - if (pcie_cap_has_lnkctl2(dev->pcie_type, flags))
> pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2,&cap[i++]);
> - if (pcie_cap_has_sltctl2(dev->pcie_type, flags))
> pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL2,&cap[i++]);
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -936,12 +935,11 @@ static void pci_restore_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, cap[i++]);
> if (pcie_cap_has_rtctl(dev->pcie_type, flags))
> pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_RTCTL, cap[i++]);
> - if (pcie_cap_has_devctl2(dev->pcie_type, flags))
> + if (pcie_cap_has_devctl2(dev->pcie_type, flags)) {
ditto.
> pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, cap[i++]);
> - if (pcie_cap_has_lnkctl2(dev->pcie_type, flags))
> pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2, cap[i++]);
> - if (pcie_cap_has_sltctl2(dev->pcie_type, flags))
> pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL2, cap[i++]);
> + }
> }
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-01 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-01 21:16 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: PCIe capability structure related cleanup/fixes Myron Stowe
2012-06-01 21:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: make pci_ltr_supported static Myron Stowe
2012-06-01 22:02 ` Don Dutile
2012-06-01 21:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: Remove redundant checking in PCI Express capability routines Myron Stowe
2012-06-01 22:02 ` Don Dutile
2012-06-01 21:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI: Add pci_pcie_cap2() check for PCIe feature capabilities >= v2 Myron Stowe
2012-06-01 21:58 ` Don Dutile
2012-06-01 21:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] PCI: Remove redundant capabilities checking in pci_{save, restore}_pcie_state Myron Stowe
2012-06-01 22:00 ` Don Dutile [this message]
2012-06-12 2:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] PCI: PCIe capability structure related cleanup/fixes Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-12 16:34 ` Myron Stowe
2012-06-12 16:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC93B90.1010907@redhat.com \
--to=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yu.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.