Re: Help with data recovering

[Maxim Mikheev <mikhmv@gmail.com>]

It was a RAID0 unfortunately.

On 06/04/2012 02:02 PM, Michael wrote:
> If he has it in a RAID 1, could he manually fail the bad disk and try
> it from there? Obviously this could be harmful, so a dd copy would be
> a VERY good idea(truthfully, that should have been the first thing
> that was done).
> Michael
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Hugo Mills<hugo@carfax.org.uk>  wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 06:04:22PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
>>>     I'm out of ideas.
>>    ... but that's not to say that someone else may have some ideas. I
>> wouldn't get your hopes up too much, though.
>>
>>>     At this point, though, you're probably looking at somebody writing
>>> custom code to scan the FS and attempt to find and retrieve anything
>>> that's recoverable.
>>>
>>>     You might try writing a tool to scan all the disks for useful
>>> fragments of old trees, and see if you can find some of the tree roots
>>> independently of the tree of tree roots (which clearly isn't
>>> particularly functional right now). You might try simply scanning the
>>> disks looking for your lost data, and try to reconstruct as much of it
>>> as you can from that. You could try to find a company specialising in
>>> data recovery and pay them to try to get your data back. Or you might
>>> just have to accept that the data's gone and work on reconstructing
>>> it.
>>    Hugo.
>>
>> --
>> === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
>>   PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
>>   --- A linked list is still a binary tree.  Just a very unbalanced ---
>>                              one.  -- dragon