From: gerg@snapgear.com (Greg Ungerer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Freescale fec.c driver breakage
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:55:23 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCDAD5B.8010106@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120604091616.GA3943@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On 04/06/12 19:16, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 10:19:37AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:42:28PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>
>>> Trivially we could conditionalize the code block that calls
>>> devm_clk_get() in the probe routine, but that is kind of ugly.
>
>> It's ugly, but the only other solution I see is that you could provide a
>> dummy devm_clk_get() for coldfire. Added Mark to Cc, maybe he has
>> another idea?
>
> Not really, I think if the clock API is going to be usable we really
> need the platforms to all be implementing it. Part of this is getting
> the stubs for !HAVE_CLK cases implemented (which doesn't seem to have
> happened :/) ). We do need to address this at the framework level,
> having to put ifdefs in all the drivers is obviously awful.
Is this something you intend "fixing" then?
I don't mind putting a simplistic (but do nothing) place holder for
this function along with the other stubbed clk functions in the m68k/
coldfire code.
But more generally I am wondering does it make sense to be working
on specific platform clocks in a multi-platform/arch driver?
Regards
Greg
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg at snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-05 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-04 4:42 Freescale fec.c driver breakage Greg Ungerer
2012-06-04 8:19 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-04 9:16 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-05 6:55 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2012-06-05 9:41 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-05 12:17 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-06-05 12:24 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-05 12:36 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-06-05 12:40 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-05 12:48 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-05 13:24 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-06-05 13:41 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-05 14:35 ` Steven King
2012-06-06 7:41 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-06-07 23:36 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-05 13:42 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FCDAD5B.8010106@snapgear.com \
--to=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.