From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33977) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sbpip-0007y5-Vb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 05:06:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sbpij-0000JN-6f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 05:06:39 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com ([209.85.210.45]:35515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sbpij-0000J2-0J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 05:06:33 -0400 Received: by dadv2 with SMTP id v2so7603548dad.4 for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 02:06:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FCDCC0D.3050401@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:06:21 +0800 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4FCDA107.3070404@intellilink.co.jp> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu 1.1.0 says 1.1.50 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Dunrong Huang Cc: "MATSUDA, Daiki" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 06/05/2012 02:15 PM, Dunrong Huang wrote: > 2012/6/5 MATSUDA, Daiki: >> I tried qemu-1.1.0. But it says 1.1.50 and >> $ echo VERSION >> 1.1.50 >> >> Is it correct ? > It's correct. Because v1.1 has released, v1.1.50 means it's a > development branch for No, it's not correct, I messed up the tarball on the website. I'll upload a new tarball to fix this with a version name of qemu-1.1.0-1.tar.bz2 Regards, Anthony Liguori > v1.2(next branch). > If you want to try latest stable version, you should download it from > http://wiki.qemu.org/download/qemu-1.1.0.tar.bz2 >> >> Regards >> MATSUDA Daiki >> > > >