All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
To: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [btrfs-progs] [bug][patch V2] Leaking file handle in scrub_fs_info()
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 22:12:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCE682D.2010204@inwind.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120605181910.GL15986@carfax.org.uk>

Hi Hugo,

On 06/05/2012 08:19 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:26:34PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli
> wrote:
>> Hi Hugo,
>> 
>> I was not able to reproduce your error with my repository: I
>> pulled it without problem.
> 
> Well, I'd have normally written it off as a corrupt local repo at 
> this end -- except that David Sterba said he'd also seen a similar 
> problem pulling from your repo.
> 
>> However, enclosed you can find the patch (as attachment) with the
>> Jan suggestions about the spaces. You can pull the patch also
>> from my repo ( same branch: fd-leaking). Moreover I inserted the
>> patch as inlined. Hoping that helps.
> 
> Not really. Your mailer is breaking things (there's a wrapped line 
> in there, and it's heavily whitespace-damaged). Could you *please* 
> learn to use git send-email? Every single patch of yours that I've 
> seen on the mailing list is badly broken, and takes an age to get
> it to the point where "git am" will look at it cleanly. It's
> incredibly frustrating. This time around, I think I've managed to
> get it to work OK, but it's taken me 10 minutes of buggering
> around, and I'm getting irritable, which isn't a good thing when
> I'm meant to be having a quiet relaxing week off work...

I perfectly understand what means loosing 10 minutes instead of 1
seconds :-)

But was you able to use the patch "attached" (not the one inlined ) ?



> 
> Hugo.
> 
>> --------------------
>> 
>> commit b73abc9465d3a105b5f8f464f2867543a638e5e2 Author: Goffredo
>> Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it> Date:   Tue Jun 5 19:11:06 2012
>> +0200
>> 
>> scrub_fs_info( ) file handle leaking
>> 
>> The function scrub_fs_info( ) closes and reopen a file handle 
>> passed as argument, when a caller uses the file handle even after
>> the call. The function scrub_fs_info( ) is updated to remove the
>> file handle argument, and instead uses a private own file
>> handle. The callers are updated to not pass the argument.
>> 
>> 
>> diff --git a/cmds-scrub.c b/cmds-scrub.c index c4503f4..6313e02
>> 100644 --- a/cmds-scrub.c +++ b/cmds-scrub.c @@ -979,19 +979,26
>> @@ static int scrub_device_info(int fd, u64 devid, return ret ?
>> -errno : 0; }
>> 
>> -static int scrub_fs_info(int fd, char *path, +static int
>> scrub_fs_info(char *path, struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args
>> *fi_args, struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args **di_ret) { int ret =
>> 0; int ndevs = 0; int i = 1; +       int fd; struct
>> btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices_mnt = NULL; struct
>> btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args *di_args; char mp[BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX +
>> 1];
>> 
>> memset(fi_args, 0, sizeof(*fi_args));
>> 
>> +       fd  = open_file_or_dir(path); +       if (fd < 0) { +
>> fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: can't access to '%s'\n", path); +
>> return -1; +       } + ret = ioctl(fd, BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO,
>> fi_args); if (ret && errno == EINVAL) { /* path is no mounted
>> btrfs. try if it's a device */ @@ -1010,28 +1017,36 @@ static int
>> scrub_fs_info(int fd, char *path, if (fd < 0) return -errno; }
>> else if (ret) { +               close(fd); return -errno; }
>> 
>> -       if (!fi_args->num_devices) +       if
>> (!fi_args->num_devices) { +               close(fd); return 0; +
>> }
>> 
>> di_args = *di_ret = malloc(fi_args->num_devices *
>> sizeof(*di_args)); -       if (!di_args) +       if (!di_args) { 
>> +               close(fd); return -errno; +       }
>> 
>> for (; i <= fi_args->max_id; ++i) { BUG_ON(ndevs >=
>> fi_args->num_devices); ret = scrub_device_info(fd, i,
>> &di_args[ndevs]); if (ret == -ENODEV) continue; -
>> if (ret) +               if (ret) { +
>> close(fd); return ret; +               } ++ndevs; }
>> 
>> BUG_ON(ndevs == 0);
>> 
>> +       close(fd); return 0; }
>> 
>> @@ -1155,7 +1170,7 @@ static int scrub_start(int argc, char
>> **argv, int resume) return 12; }
>> 
>> -       ret = scrub_fs_info(fdmnt, path, &fi_args, &di_args); +
>> ret = scrub_fs_info(path, &fi_args, &di_args); if (ret) { 
>> ERR(!do_quiet, "ERROR: getting dev info for scrub failed: " 
>> "%s\n", strerror(-ret)); @@ -1586,7 +1601,6 @@ static int
>> cmd_scrub_status(int argc, char **argv) .sun_family = AF_UNIX, 
>> }; int ret; -       int fdmnt; int i; int print_raw = 0; int
>> do_stats_per_dev = 0; @@ -1615,13 +1629,7 @@ static int
>> cmd_scrub_status(int argc, char **argv)
>> 
>> path = argv[optind];
>> 
>> -       fdmnt = open_file_or_dir(path); -       if (fdmnt < 0) { 
>> -               fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: can't access to '%s'\n",
>> path); -               return 12; -       } - -       ret =
>> scrub_fs_info(fdmnt, path, &fi_args, &di_args); +       ret =
>> scrub_fs_info(path, &fi_args, &di_args); if (ret) { 
>> fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: getting dev info for scrub failed: " 
>> "%s\n", strerror(-ret)); @@ -1698,7 +1706,6 @@ static int
>> cmd_scrub_status(int argc, char **argv) out: 
>> free_history(past_scrubs); free(di_args); -       close(fdmnt); 
>> if (fdres > -1) close(fdres);
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 06/05/2012 01:01 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
>>> Hi, Goffredo,
>>> 
>>> I'm trying to do a new integration branch, and the patch inline
>>> in the text is corrupt (plus it has a massively verbose commit
>>> message):
>>> 
>>> Applying: Leaking file handle in scrub_fs_info() fatal: corrupt
>>> patch at line 74 Patch failed at 0001 Leaking file handle in
>>> scrub_fs_info()
>>> 
>>> Normally, I'd use your git repo to get round the fact that
>>> every single patch you send by mail is whitespace-damaged,
>>> but:
>>> 
>>> error: Unable to find 337bfb3250203a66b953ffcf7804418cb7c72052
>>> under
>>> http://cassiopea.homelinux.net/git/btrfs-progs-unstable.git 
>>> Cannot obtain needed commit
>>> 337bfb3250203a66b953ffcf7804418cb7c72052 while processing
>>> commit ee3832b47a4b1d1dce8d1cacc802db32901b8c45. error: Fetch
>>> failed.
>>> 
>>> Plus Jan had some suggested tweaks regarding whitespace --
>>> could you re-roll the patch and maybe see what you can do to
>>> fix your git repo? (Or at least use git-send-email to send the
>>> patch so it doesn't get mangled).
>>> 
>>> Thanks, Hugo.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:43:23PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli
>>> wrote:
>>>> I was giving a look to the function scrub_fs_info( ), and to
>>>> me it seems that could be a potential file handle leaking
>>>> problem.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In fact:
>>>> 
>>>> static int scrub_fs_info(int fd, char *path, struct
>>>> btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args *fi_args, struct
>>>> btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args **di_ret) {
>>>> 
>>>> [...]
>>>> 
>>>> ret = ioctl(fd, BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO, fi_args); if (ret && errno
>>>> == EINVAL) { /* path is no mounted btrfs. try if it's a
>>>> device */ [...] close(fd);			<--- Here the file handle is 
>>>> closed
>>>> 
>>>> fd = open_file_or_dir(mp);	<--- then it is re-opened if (fd <
>>>> 0) return -errno; } else if (ret) { return -errno; } [...]
>>>> 
>>>> But in the rest of the function: a) the file handle is not
>>>> closed b) the (new) file handle isn't returned
>>>> 
>>>> The function "scrub_fs_info()" is called from the functions 
>>>> 1) cmd_scrub_status(), which doesn't use the file handle
>>>> after the call to the cmd_scrub_status() [except for a
>>>> close()]. So no problem at all. 2) scrub_start(), which uses
>>>> the file handle after the call to the cmd_scrub_status()
>>>> functions.
>>>> 
>>>> My suggestions is to change scrub_fs_info() to accept only
>>>> the path. Then it open (and closes) its own (and private) the
>>>> file descriptor.
>>>> 
>>>> Instead scrub_start(), opens a file descriptor after the call
>>>> to the scrub_fs_info() function.
>>>> 
>>>> What do you think ?
>>>> 
>>>> BR G.Baroncelli
>>>> 
>>>> You can pull the patch below from
>>>> 
>>>> http://cassiopea.homelinux.net/git/btrfs-progs-unstable.git
>>>> 
>>>> branch
>>>> 
>>>> fd-leaking
>>>> 
>>>> -----
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/cmds-scrub.c b/cmds-scrub.c index
>>>> c4503f4..486768c 100644 --- a/cmds-scrub.c +++
>>>> b/cmds-scrub.c @@ -979,19 +979,26 @@ static int
>>>> scrub_device_info(int fd, u64 devid, return ret ? -errno :
>>>> 0; }
>>>> 
>>>> -static int scrub_fs_info(int fd, char *path, +static int
>>>> scrub_fs_info( char *path, struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args
>>>> *fi_args, struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args **di_ret) { int
>>>> ret = 0; int ndevs = 0; int i = 1; +	int fd; struct
>>>> btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices_mnt = NULL; struct
>>>> btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args *di_args; char
>>>> mp[BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX + 1];
>>>> 
>>>> memset(fi_args, 0, sizeof(*fi_args));
>>>> 
>>>> +	fd  = open_file_or_dir(path); +	if (fd < 0) { +
>>>> fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: can't access to '%s'\n", path); +
>>>> return -1; +	} + ret = ioctl(fd, BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO,
>>>> fi_args); if (ret && errno == EINVAL) { /* path is no mounted
>>>> btrfs. try if it's a device */ @@ -1010,28 +1017,36 @@ static
>>>> int scrub_fs_info(int fd, char *path, if (fd < 0) return
>>>> -errno; } else if (ret) { +		close(fd); return -errno; }
>>>> 
>>>> -	if (!fi_args->num_devices) +	if (!fi_args->num_devices){ +
>>>> close(fd); return 0; +	}
>>>> 
>>>> di_args = *di_ret = malloc(fi_args->num_devices *
>>>> sizeof(*di_args)); -	if (!di_args) +	if (!di_args){ +
>>>> close(fd); return -errno; +	}
>>>> 
>>>> for (; i <= fi_args->max_id; ++i) { BUG_ON(ndevs >=
>>>> fi_args->num_devices); ret = scrub_device_info(fd, i,
>>>> &di_args[ndevs]); if (ret == -ENODEV) continue; -		if (ret) +
>>>> if (ret){ +			close(fd); return ret; +		} ++ndevs; }
>>>> 
>>>> BUG_ON(ndevs == 0);
>>>> 
>>>> +	close(fd); return 0; }
>>>> 
>>>> @@ -1155,7 +1170,7 @@ static int scrub_start(int argc, char
>>>> **argv, int resume) return 12; }
>>>> 
>>>> -	ret = scrub_fs_info(fdmnt, path, &fi_args, &di_args); +	ret
>>>> = scrub_fs_info(path, &fi_args, &di_args); if (ret) { 
>>>> ERR(!do_quiet, "ERROR: getting dev info for scrub failed: " 
>>>> "%s\n", strerror(-ret)); @@ -1586,7 +1601,6 @@ static int
>>>> cmd_scrub_status(int argc, char **argv) .sun_family =
>>>> AF_UNIX, }; int ret; -	int fdmnt; int i; int print_raw = 0; 
>>>> int do_stats_per_dev = 0; @@ -1615,13 +1629,7 @@ static int
>>>> cmd_scrub_status(int argc, char **argv)
>>>> 
>>>> path = argv[optind];
>>>> 
>>>> -	fdmnt = open_file_or_dir(path); -	if (fdmnt < 0) { -
>>>> fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: can't access to '%s'\n", path); -
>>>> return 12; -	} - -	ret = scrub_fs_info(fdmnt, path, &fi_args,
>>>> &di_args); +	ret = scrub_fs_info(path, &fi_args, &di_args); 
>>>> if (ret) { fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: getting dev info for scrub
>>>> failed: " "%s\n", strerror(-ret)); @@ -1698,7 +1706,6 @@
>>>> static int cmd_scrub_status(int argc, char **argv) out: 
>>>> free_history(past_scrubs); free(di_args); -	close(fdmnt); if
>>>> (fdres > -1) close(fdres);
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
>> diff --git a/cmds-scrub.c b/cmds-scrub.c index c4503f4..6313e02
>> 100644 --- a/cmds-scrub.c +++ b/cmds-scrub.c @@ -979,19 +979,26
>> @@ static int scrub_device_info(int fd, u64 devid, return ret ?
>> -errno : 0; }
>> 
>> -static int scrub_fs_info(int fd, char *path, +static int
>> scrub_fs_info(char *path, struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args
>> *fi_args, struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args **di_ret) { int ret =
>> 0; int ndevs = 0; int i = 1; +	int fd; struct btrfs_fs_devices
>> *fs_devices_mnt = NULL; struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args
>> *di_args; char mp[BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX + 1];
>> 
>> memset(fi_args, 0, sizeof(*fi_args));
>> 
>> +	fd  = open_file_or_dir(path); +	if (fd < 0) { +
>> fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: can't access to '%s'\n", path); +		return
>> -1; +	} + ret = ioctl(fd, BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO, fi_args); if (ret &&
>> errno == EINVAL) { /* path is no mounted btrfs. try if it's a
>> device */ @@ -1010,28 +1017,36 @@ static int scrub_fs_info(int
>> fd, char *path, if (fd < 0) return -errno; } else if (ret) { +
>> close(fd); return -errno; }
>> 
>> -	if (!fi_args->num_devices) +	if (!fi_args->num_devices) { +
>> close(fd); return 0; +	}
>> 
>> di_args = *di_ret = malloc(fi_args->num_devices *
>> sizeof(*di_args)); -	if (!di_args) +	if (!di_args) { +
>> close(fd); return -errno; +	}
>> 
>> for (; i <= fi_args->max_id; ++i) { BUG_ON(ndevs >=
>> fi_args->num_devices); ret = scrub_device_info(fd, i,
>> &di_args[ndevs]); if (ret == -ENODEV) continue; -		if (ret) +		if
>> (ret) { +			close(fd); return ret; +		} ++ndevs; }
>> 
>> BUG_ON(ndevs == 0);
>> 
>> +	close(fd); return 0; }
>> 
>> @@ -1155,7 +1170,7 @@ static int scrub_start(int argc, char
>> **argv, int resume) return 12; }
>> 
>> -	ret = scrub_fs_info(fdmnt, path, &fi_args, &di_args); +	ret =
>> scrub_fs_info(path, &fi_args, &di_args); if (ret) { 
>> ERR(!do_quiet, "ERROR: getting dev info for scrub failed: " 
>> "%s\n", strerror(-ret)); @@ -1586,7 +1601,6 @@ static int
>> cmd_scrub_status(int argc, char **argv) .sun_family = AF_UNIX, 
>> }; int ret; -	int fdmnt; int i; int print_raw = 0; int
>> do_stats_per_dev = 0; @@ -1615,13 +1629,7 @@ static int
>> cmd_scrub_status(int argc, char **argv)
>> 
>> path = argv[optind];
>> 
>> -	fdmnt = open_file_or_dir(path); -	if (fdmnt < 0) { -
>> fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: can't access to '%s'\n", path); -		return
>> 12; -	} - -	ret = scrub_fs_info(fdmnt, path, &fi_args,
>> &di_args); +	ret = scrub_fs_info(path, &fi_args, &di_args); if
>> (ret) { fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: getting dev info for scrub
>> failed: " "%s\n", strerror(-ret)); @@ -1698,7 +1706,6 @@ static
>> int cmd_scrub_status(int argc, char **argv) out: 
>> free_history(past_scrubs); free(di_args); -	close(fdmnt); if
>> (fdres > -1) close(fdres);
>> 
> 
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2012-06-05 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-24 18:43 [btrfs-progs] [bug][patch] Leaking file handle in scrub_fs_info() Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-04-25  9:39 ` Jan Schmidt
2012-04-25 19:07   ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-06-05 11:01 ` Hugo Mills
2012-06-05 17:26   ` [btrfs-progs] [bug][patch V2] " Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-06-05 18:19     ` Hugo Mills
2012-06-05 20:12       ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FCE682D.2010204@inwind.it \
    --to=kreijack@inwind.it \
    --cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.