Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/16] introduce OptsVisitor, rebase -net/-netdev parsing

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

Am 06.06.2012 16:10, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 06/06/2012 15:31, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>> (a) add < 0 checks to <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/150427/> and
>>>>     include it in the series,
>>>> (b) make all Netdev integer types as strict as possible, remove
>>>>     superfluous checks,
>>>> (c) render NetLegacy::name optional.
>>>>
>>>> How do I lay out (a)? Should I include the patch verbatim first (with
>>>> proper From: and Signed-off-by: lines) and then modify it in a small
>>>> followup, or squash those two and... what? :)
>> I am missing context here. The referenced patch is on qom-next already
>> and will thus be in my upcoming PULL (today or tomorrow) unless someone
>> comments on that patch, cc'ing me, that there's an error. Feel free to
>> cherry-pick from there but do not squash into random series please.
>>
>> I don't understand what < 0 checks you are talking about, lacking time
>> to go through this QIDL patch series ATM.
> 
> The uintXX visitors do not fail if you pass a negative value.  I'm fine
> with including the patch with the small bug and fixing it as a
> follow-up, there's plenty of time before 1.2.

With a view to your qdev patch converting to those visitors I think we
should fix up Michael's patch in my queue before we use it for x86 CPU
and qdev. Laszlo, can you send me a patch? Then I'll defer sending out
the qom-next PULL.

Thanks,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg