From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4FD0F09F.9050304@xenomai.org> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:19:11 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4FBCB442.5030208@wanadoo.fr> <4FBCB64E.6090209@xenomai.org> <4FBCB89A.9090801@wanadoo.fr> <4FBCD8EC.60305@xenomai.org> <4FD0DF23.2030909@wanadoo.fr> <4FD0E198.7000606@xenomai.org> In-Reply-To: <4FD0E198.7000606@xenomai.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] iMX6 support List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thierry Bultel Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On 06/07/2012 07:15 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 06/07/2012 07:04 PM, Thierry Bultel wrote: >> Hi, >> I have another question about the iMX6, >> it is about the TSC emulation . >> >> I have been told that the Pentium TSC could not be accurate enough >> for a one of our application that performs high precision data acquisition. >> >> Can we expect a better accuracy with the TSC emulation based >> on the ARM timer or not ? > > Xenomai tsc emulation is usually based on a hardware timer which has a > lower frequency than the core. ARM tsc emulation. Other architectures are different. -- Gilles.