All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <darren.hart@intel.com>
To: "Barros Pena, Belen" <belen.barros.pena@intel.com>
Cc: "Lock, Joshua" <joshua.lock@intel.com>,
	"yocto@yoctoproject.org" <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 07:40:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD20ED9.4090809@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CBF7C947.109A2%belen.barros.pena@intel.com>

On 06/08/2012 07:28 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
> Vanilla 5 - branded 0 :)
> 
> Shane, Dongxiao and Alex: from an implementation point of view, I guess
> this means eliminating any hardcoded UI-related values (button colours and
> styles, for example).

GTK should be able to pull those colors and styles from the existing
theme. As Joshua mentioned in a hallway conversation, the highlight
color of the theme can be requested and used, rather than using a
hardcoded one. This still allows for customization of the UI, but keeps
the color scheme consistent.

> Joshua: if you have a rough idea of the things that
> will need to be changed from the work you did before the 1.2 release,
> please let us know. I think we should keep the existing icons, though.
> What do you think?

The existing artwork and general layout are nice and help indicate
intended usage. In my humble opinion, they should stay.

--
Darren

> 
> Shane: will I log this in bugzilla so that you can assign it a milestone
> and an owner?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Belen
> 
> On 31/05/2012 20:01, "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Belen,
>>
>> On 31 May 2012 17:55, Barros Pena, Belen <belen.barros.pena@intel.com>
>> wrote:
>>> As part of the Hob work for the 1.3 release it looks like we need to
>>> make
>>> a visual design and implementation decision: do we want a 'vanilla' or a
>>> 'branded' look for Hob? Sorry if the choice of words is not the best.
>>> Neither 'vanilla' nor 'branded' are meant in any negative way.
>>
>> Vanilla, definitely.  Aside from sticking out like a sore thumb on the
>> user's desktop, a "branded" interface in something like GTK+ is
>> normally trickier to implement.
>>
>> Ross
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
> Registered No. 1134945 (England)
> Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
> VAT No: 860 2173 47
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel


  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-08 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CBED5FA2.10462%belen.barros.pena@intel.com>
2012-05-31 16:55 ` Hob implementation: vanilla or branded? Barros Pena, Belen
2012-05-31 17:08   ` Tomas Frydrych
2012-05-31 17:55     ` Jack Mitchell
2012-05-31 18:08   ` Darren Hart
2012-05-31 18:58   ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
2012-05-31 19:01   ` Burton, Ross
2012-06-08 14:28     ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-06-08 14:40       ` Darren Hart [this message]
2012-06-08 16:41       ` Joshua Lock
2012-06-08 20:24         ` Burton, Ross
2012-06-08 20:26           ` Joshua Lock
2012-06-08 20:31             ` Burton, Ross
2012-06-08 20:42               ` Stewart, David C
2012-06-08 20:56                 ` Burton, Ross
2012-06-11  9:31           ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-06-11  9:30         ` Barros Pena, Belen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FD20ED9.4090809@intel.com \
    --to=darren.hart@intel.com \
    --cc=belen.barros.pena@intel.com \
    --cc=joshua.lock@intel.com \
    --cc=yocto@yoctoproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.