From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, brudley@broadcom.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] brcmsmac: do not call brcms_c_chipmatch() for non PCI
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:03:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD49B12.9030705@hauke-m.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FD0FBB5.6040008@broadcom.com>
On 06/07/2012 09:06 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 03:19 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> Hi Arend,
>>
>> On 06/06/2012 01:23 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2012 01:07 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>>> brcms_c_chipmatch() just works for PCIe devices and returns false for
>>>> non PCIe devices. This stops brcms_ops_stop() from calling it when the
>>>> devices is not a PCIe device.
>>>
>>> Although this is true you may want to consider what this function
>>> provides. The intent is to have a more accurate filter to determine
>>> support the device by the driver, ie. more accurate than what is in the
>>> driver device table.
>>>
>>> So in brcms_c_chipmatch() we may want a host-type independent filtering
>>> and validate bcma_device_id, bcma_chipinfo, and possibly bcma_boardinfo.
>> I do not like this function at all. ;-)
>>
>> Are these restrictions in this function really needed? I would more like
>> to restrict it to something like core revs, which is done in the device
>> table and the phy types and versions. A restriction by chipid would also
>> be reasonable as some chips are needing some special workarounds, these
>> checks could also be done for SoCs.
>
> I look where the function came from and it is called in several places
> in our proprietary driver, which has a pretty coarse filter in the
> device table.
>
> The BCMA device table in brcmsmac is more finegrained and currently has
> entries for the different 80211 core revisions. However, the brcmsmac
> may have additional revision requirement for chipcommon and other cores
> inside the chip so this function may have it merits for checking that.
>
> Gr. AvS
>
Hi Arend,
ok, then I will extend it somehow to also handle the SoCs based on the
chip id and rev in that function.
Hauke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-10 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-05 23:07 [PATCH 00/18] brcmsmac: update to get SoCs working Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 01/18] brcmsmac: remove PCIE() makro Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-07 20:05 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-10 13:28 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-11 7:51 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-11 21:36 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 02/18] brcmsmac: remove PCI_FORCEHT() makro Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-07 20:12 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 03/18] brcmsmac: remove ai_get_buscore{type,rev}() Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:17 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 13:48 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-07 19:36 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 04/18] brcmsmac: use container_of instead of cast Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:27 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 13:45 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 05/18] brcmsmac: remove ai_findcore() Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:28 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 06/18] brcmsmac: remove si_pmu_init() and si_pmu_res_init() Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:31 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 07/18] brcmsmac: remove si_pmu_spuravoid_pllupdate() Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:33 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 08/18] brcmsmac: remove some redundant chip common workarounds Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 12:14 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 12:59 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 09/18] brcmsmac: use core id constants from bcma Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:43 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 10/18] brcmsmac: use chip and package " Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:44 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 11/18] brcmsmac: remove some unnessessacry casts and void pointer Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 9:46 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 12/18] brcmsmac: add a conditions for core rev 17 again Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 13/18] brcmsmac: add some workarounds for other chips again Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 10:03 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 13:45 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-07 19:34 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-08 11:31 ` Jonas Gorski
2012-06-08 16:54 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-08 17:49 ` Jonas Gorski
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 14/18] brcmsmac: extend xmtfifo_sz array Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 10:24 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 13:33 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-07 19:21 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-10 13:10 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-11 7:59 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-11 21:44 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 15/18] brcmsmac: fix DMA on SoCs Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 11:10 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 13:29 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 16/18] brcmsmac: do not call brcms_c_chipmatch() for non PCI Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 11:23 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 13:19 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-07 19:06 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-10 13:03 ` Hauke Mehrtens [this message]
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 17/18] brcmsmac: fix read in write_phy_reg Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 11:39 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH 18/18] brcmsmac: handle non PCI devices in the phy code Hauke Mehrtens
2012-06-06 11:43 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 13:00 ` Hauke Mehrtens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD49B12.9030705@hauke-m.de \
--to=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=brudley@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.