From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Se7tZ-0003W2-Vt for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:55:14 +0200 Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jun 2012 09:44:39 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="164236132" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.133]) ([10.255.12.133]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jun 2012 09:44:39 -0700 Message-ID: <4FD62077.2030209@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:44:39 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <4FD60D68.4040809@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Missing Patch Headers X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:55:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 06/11/2012 08:34 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Saul Wold wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> We recently had a spat of new patches added without patch headers, ie no >> patch comment, Signed-off-by or Upstream-Status. >> >> Please review this list and update the patch and submit a new commit. >> >> Zhai Edwin - >> meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango-1.28.4/multilib-fix-clean.patch >> Laurentiu Palcu - >> meta/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/libdirect-remove-include-of-linux-config.h.patch >> Cristian Iorga - >> meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/fix_building_fom_archive.patch >> Xiaofeng Yan - meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts/functions.patch >> Mark Hatle - meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/binutils-armv5e.patch >> Mark Hatle - meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-resolvedep.patch >> Andreas Müller - >> meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap/runtime-staprun-configure.ac-support-without-nss-for.patch >> Bruce Ashfield - >> meta/recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0/lttng-modules/lttng-sycalls-protect-is_compat_task-from-redefiniti.patch > > Your script is wrong here. That patch has everything you'd expect, > since it follows kernel > patch conventions. Subject, shortlog, log log and sign-off. > > So don't expect any resubmission from me on this one, since I won't be > putting an upstream > status directly in the patch. > This is a patch in OE-Core, not in the kernel, there is no reason you can't update this patch to include the Upstream-Status:? What is the status of this patch anyway? Is it a backport? Sau! > Bruce > >> >> >> Thanks >> -- >> Sau! >> >> Saul Wold >> Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel >> Yocto Project / Poky Build System >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > >