From: Benoit Papillault <benoit.papillault@free.fr>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] TX power and TPC
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:38:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD70023.1000603@free.fr> (raw)
Hello there,
I'm working on EN 301 893 certification. There is a part regarding the
RF Output Power to make sure that the RF Output Power is within some
limits. Let's say 27 dBm at 5600 MHz for instance.
In 4.4.1.1, the RF Output Power is defined as the "mean EIRP during a
transmission burst". This is exactly the RF power at the connector + the
antenna gain.
So, I started with an AR9280 card / ath9k and hookep up to a Spectrum
Analyzer with a Channel Power measure. It has been configured with RMS
detector / Average trace over 100 samples. In order to be close to 100%
duty cycle, I did a "ping -I wlan0 -b 255.255.255.255 -f -s 1472" (OK,
this is not perfect, but it has been compared with continuous transmit
on some other chipset and gives a 0.1 dBm difference).
I also did a Peak power measure using the Peak detector / Max hold trace
of the spectrum analyzer. I made another measure using a USB power
sensor over 10MHz - 12.4 GHz. Here are the raw results (iwconfig is the
reported TX power, BTW, any way to do that with iw ? ) :
mBm | iwconfig | Peak/Max Hold | RMS/Average | USB Power Sensor
0 | 3 dBm | -3.8 dBm | -14.5 dBm | -14.2 dBm
100 | 3 dBm | -3.2 dBm | -14.4 dBm | -14.1 dBm
200 | 3 dBm | -3.3 dBm | -14.4 dBm | -14.1 dBm
300 | 3 dBm | -3.1 dBm | -14.5 dBm | -14.1 dBm
400 | 4 dBm | 0.6 dBm | -11.4 dBm | -10.0 dBm
500 | 5 dBm | 2.9 dBm | -9.5 dBm | -7.9 dBm
600 | 6 dBm | 4.8 dBm | -7.8 dBm | -6.0 dBm
700 | 7 dBm | 6.2 dBm | -6.5 dBm | -4.6 dBm
800 | 8 dBm | 7.4 dBm | -5.6 dBm | -3.5 dBm
900 | 9 dBm | 8.6 dBm | -4.6 dBm | -2.3 dBm
1000 | 10 dBm | 9.7 dBm | -3.6 dBm | -1.1 dBm
1100 | 11 dBm | 10.8 dBm | -2.7 dBm | -0.1 dBm
1200 | 12 dBm | 12.0 dBm | -2.0 dBm | 0.9 dBm
1300 | 13 dBm | 12.7 dBm | -1.2 dBm | 1.6 dBm
1400 | 14 dBm | 13.5 dBm | -0.2 dBm | 2.8 dBm
1500 | 15 dBm | 15.0 dBm | 1.0 dBm | 3.9 dBm
1600 | 16 dBm | 16.3 dBm | 2.2 dBm | 5.2 dBm
1700 | 17 dBm | 18.1 dBm | 2.8 dBm | 6.1 dBm
1800 | 18 dBm | 18.4 dBm | 3.5 dBm | 6.9 dBm
1900 | 19 dBm | 19.7 dBm | 4.2 dBm | 7.6 dBm
2000 | 20 dBm | 20.1 dBm | 5.2 dBm | 8.8 dBm
2100 | 21 dBm | 21.0 dBm | 6.0 dBm | 9.7 dBm
I am not 100% confident in the way I did all those measures. If you know
a better way to achieve them, please stand up.
Questions are :
1. since regulatory limitation are based on "mean EIRP over burst" ...
why the driver is calibrated over "peak power" ? We are just loosing 11
dBm or so.
2. What would explain the difference between the RMS power measured from
the SA and the power measured by the power sensor ?
Regards,
Benoit
next reply other threads:[~2012-06-12 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-12 8:38 Benoit Papillault [this message]
2012-06-12 9:28 ` [ath9k-devel] TX power and TPC Holger Schurig
2012-06-12 9:50 ` Benoit Papillault
2012-06-13 5:49 ` Holger Schurig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD70023.1000603@free.fr \
--to=benoit.papillault@free.fr \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.