From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com (comal.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.152]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98A5E00746 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:10:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dlelxv30.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by comal.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id q5CDAYPw012558; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:10:34 -0500 Received: from DFLE71.ent.ti.com (dfle71.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.62]) by dlelxv30.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5CDAY4p028143; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:10:34 -0500 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by dfle71.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:10:34 -0500 Received: from gtwmills.gt.design.ti.com (gtwmills.gt.design.ti.com [158.218.102.52]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5CDAXKR012266; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:10:33 -0500 Message-ID: <4FD73FC9.7010002@ti.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:10:33 -0400 From: William Mills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/3.1.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denys Dmytriyenko References: <20120612011706.GD30300@denix.org> In-Reply-To: <20120612011706.GD30300@denix.org> Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: RFC: creating "extras" layer X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:10:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/11/2012 09:17 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > The initial split (which is still "work in progress"), following the above > description (except the systemd for now) can be checked at: > > http://arago-project.org/git/?p=meta-ti.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/split I'm glad to see this work going. I was surprised to see that the extra layer was embedded into the existing one. Is that right? When we talked before we spoke of two layers at the top level.