All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
To: Santosh Hosamani <Santosh_Hosamani@mindtree.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bug in btrfs-debug-tree for two  or more devices.
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:49:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD77336.6050800@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24763ECA27C26742BD79B0D67389CD0E071B3067@MTW02MBX05.mindtree.com>

On 06/12/2012 08:53 AM, Santosh Hosamani wrote:
> 
> Hi btrfs folks,
>                 I am working on btrfs filesystem on how it manages the free space. And found out btrfs maintain a ctree which manages the physical location of the chunks and stripes of the filesystem.
> Btrfs-debug-tree also gives the information on the chunk tree
> 
> I created btrfs on single device and two device.I have attached the output of both on running btrfs-debug-tree.
> For single device sum of all the length in the chunks will add upto the total used bytes which is expected behavior.
> 
> But for two devices sum of all lengths in the chunks does not add to the total bytes .Am I missing something .
> Also I notice that for the second device the superblock location 0x10000 is not considered as used .
> 
> I would be really grateful if you folks can answer my query.

It's definitely not a bug in debug-tree, but just a problem in
interpreting the result. Could you please paste the output of
btrfs-debug-tree -d? This way it is easier to see what's
bothering you :)

> 
> I hav run these tests on SLES11-sp2-x86
> Kernel 3.0.13.0.27-default
> 
> If you want any further clarification I would be wiiling to help you guys on this.
> 
> Thanks,
> Santosh Hosamani
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> http://www.mindtree.com/email/disclaimer.html


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-12 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-12  6:53 Bug in btrfs-debug-tree for two or more devices Santosh Hosamani
2012-06-12 14:57 ` Randy Barlow
2012-06-13  8:43   ` Santosh Hosamani
2012-06-12 15:22 ` Duncan
2012-06-12 16:49 ` Arne Jansen [this message]
2012-06-13  4:39   ` Santosh Hosamani
2012-06-12 20:06 ` Hugo Mills
2012-06-13  8:40   ` Santosh Hosamani
2012-06-12 22:58 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FD77336.6050800@gmx.net \
    --to=sensille@gmx.net \
    --cc=Santosh_Hosamani@mindtree.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.