From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Fastabend Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] dcbnl: Major simplifications Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:06:20 -0700 Message-ID: <4FDA0BFC.90807@intel.com> References: <20120613.155541.26513304496438357.davem@davemloft.net> <20120614075435.GA29185@canuck.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, lucy.liu@intel.com To: tgraf@suug.ch, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:61658 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754256Ab2FNQGu (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:06:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120614075435.GA29185@canuck.infradead.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 6/14/2012 12:54 AM, Thomas Graf wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 03:55:41PM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> Lots of deleted code, I like it :-) >> >> Applied, but could you send a follow-on patch to use BUG_ON() instead >> of that "if (!ptr) { /* ... */ BUG(); }" construct? > > Sure, I must have had a weak moment right there :) > Nice! I'm a bit late but dumped this into my dcbnl netlink test kit and everything looks good so... Tested-by: john.r.fastabend@intel.com