diff for duplicates of <4FDA2DDA.1030704@wwwdotorg.org> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index ff86aa8..6e83433 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -9,19 +9,20 @@ "ref\020120613081910.GB6528@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de\0" "ref\04FD85127.8050301@firmworks.com\0" "ref\020120614091905.GA9081@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de\0" - "From\0Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>\0" + "ref\020120614091905.GA9081-RM9K5IK7kjIQXX3q8xo1gnVAuStQJXxyR5q1nwbD4aMs9pC9oP6+/A@public.gmane.org\0" + "From\0Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] ARM: tegra: pcie: Add device tree support\0" "Date\0Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:30:50 -0600\0" - "To\0Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>\0" - "Cc\0Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com>" - Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - linux-pci@vger.kernel.org - devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org - Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> - Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> - Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> - linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org - " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Thierry Reding <thierry.reding-RM9K5IK7kjKj5M59NBduVrNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>\0" + "Cc\0Mitch Bradley <wmb-D5eQfiDGL7eakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>" + Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org> + linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org + devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org + Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> + Jesse Barnes <jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org> + Colin Cross <ccross-z5hGa2qSFaRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> + linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org + " linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 06/14/2012 03:19 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:\n" @@ -118,4 +119,4 @@ "parameter and call it multiple times, rather than accept a struct\n" device as a parameter and hence need multiple devices? -0b723104befca7d14d43f15ba4628aab1f0d3ac5b34b730d47355bd580e22aea +fe0c1de6a2c8940239c6589a4874d8a32734551a0a6211061727c858d82e163a
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 082a0f5..f3af14c 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ just "ranges;" be simpler? > #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; > -> pci@80000000 { +> pci at 80000000 { I'm still not convinced that using the address of the port's registers is the correct way to represent each port. The port index seems much @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ should indicate how to do this. > nvidia,ctrl-offset = <0x110>; nvidia,num-lanes = <2>; }; > -> pci@80001000 { compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-pcie-port"; reg = +> pci at 80001000 { compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-pcie-port"; reg = > <0x80001000 0x00001000>; status = "disabled"; > > #address-cells = <3>; #size-cells = <2>; diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index ff86aa8..f04d598 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -9,19 +9,10 @@ "ref\020120613081910.GB6528@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de\0" "ref\04FD85127.8050301@firmworks.com\0" "ref\020120614091905.GA9081@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de\0" - "From\0Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] ARM: tegra: pcie: Add device tree support\0" + "From\0swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v2 07/10] ARM: tegra: pcie: Add device tree support\0" "Date\0Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:30:50 -0600\0" - "To\0Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>\0" - "Cc\0Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com>" - Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - linux-pci@vger.kernel.org - devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org - Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> - Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> - Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> - linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org - " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 06/14/2012 03:19 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:\n" @@ -45,7 +36,7 @@ "\n" "> #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>;\n" "> \n" - "> pci@80000000 {\n" + "> pci at 80000000 {\n" "\n" "I'm still not convinced that using the address of the port's registers\n" "is the correct way to represent each port. The port index seems much\n" @@ -88,7 +79,7 @@ "\n" "> nvidia,ctrl-offset = <0x110>; nvidia,num-lanes = <2>; };\n" "> \n" - "> pci@80001000 { compatible = \"nvidia,tegra20-pcie-port\"; reg =\n" + "> pci at 80001000 { compatible = \"nvidia,tegra20-pcie-port\"; reg =\n" "> <0x80001000 0x00001000>; status = \"disabled\";\n" "> \n" "> #address-cells = <3>; #size-cells = <2>;\n" @@ -118,4 +109,4 @@ "parameter and call it multiple times, rather than accept a struct\n" device as a parameter and hence need multiple devices? -0b723104befca7d14d43f15ba4628aab1f0d3ac5b34b730d47355bd580e22aea +425bfe3baa033bf6ca16621c8af4be3a72996eb7cc39ff279b629532d71fd40f
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.