All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, robert.richter@amd.com,
	andreas.herrmann3@amd.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86, fpu: unify signal handling code paths for x86 and x86_64 kernels
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:17:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDA8D3B.5020107@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339723004.3475.59.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com>

On 06/14/2012 06:16 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 18:13 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 06/14/2012 06:07 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>>> Ok. Fix for the existing mainline code appended. Can you queue this
>>> separately?
>>
>> Your unification patch still needs this too, though, right?
>>
> 
> Yes, that will be new code. Not for 3.5 though. So will send it
> separately, when I send the non-RFC version of the signal unification
> patches.
> 

Thanks.  Actually what would be better is to just base that patch on top
of tip:x86/urgent unless it is already merged into mainline by then.

	-hpa



  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-15  1:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-13  0:03 [RFC] x86, fpu: unify signal handling code paths for x86 and x86_64 kernels Suresh Siddha
2012-06-13  0:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-14 14:37 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2012-06-14 20:45   ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-15  0:10   ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-15  0:16     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-15  1:07       ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-15  1:13         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-15  1:16           ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-15  1:17             ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-06-16  3:14         ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, compat: Use test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32) in compat signal delivery tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-06-14 20:48 ` [RFC] x86, fpu: unify signal handling code paths for x86 and x86_64 kernels H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-14 20:49   ` Suresh Siddha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FDA8D3B.5020107@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=hans.rosenfeld@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.