From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>
Subject: Re: degraded raid 6 (1 bad drive) showing up inactive, only spares
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:35:15 +0200
Message-ID: <4FDB1DF3.3080401@schinagl.nl>
References: <B5902F16-9C82-4072-BD67-FC6D6488ADB7@googlemail.com> <20120607222933.14ec3cd5@notabene.brown> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1206080743310.25054@uplift.swm.pp.se> <20120615173719.6076714f@notabene.brown>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120615173719.6076714f@notabene.brown>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Neil,

Good read! I don't know if it's important to have a list of all affected 
kernels, but as a Gentoo user, know that it affects at least the 
unstable branch, but I would not be surprised if it even affects the 
stable hardened kernel. I run those on my servers and may have noticed 
that behavior on my arrays as well.

Oliver

On 15-06-12 09:37, NeilBrown wrote:
> At the suggestion of Mikael Abrahamsson I have written
>
>    http://neil.brown.name/blog/20120615073245
>
> discussing this bug in detail.
>
> I'll probably post the whole thing to Linux RAID tomorrow, which a better
> subject line.
>
> NeilBrown