From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from owa.outnet.ch (owa.outnet.ch [80.67.146.1]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A91E013EB for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 02:07:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TKSSREX01.outnet.ch ([10.10.10.1]) by tkssrexhcu01.outnet.ch ([172.17.220.45]) with mapi; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:07:33 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Messerer?= To: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:07:32 +0200 Thread-Topic: Bug 2256 - kernel menuconfig confusion with sstate Thread-Index: Ac1K1dJq7Qw8BbIIQMii5nfgeGL9Fg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US, de-CH X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, de-CH MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Darren Hart $dvhart@linux.intel.com$" Subject: Bug 2256 - kernel menuconfig confusion with sstate X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:07:36 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A7B59F6D52627C44813C136D437B0832068BC78CB34ATKSSREX01ou_" --_000_A7B59F6D52627C44813C136D437B0832068BC78CB34ATKSSREX01ou_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Darren You suggested in Bug 2256 the following: $ bitbake virtual/kernel -c cleansstate $ bitbake virtual/kernel -c menuconfig $ bitbake virtual/kernel -c compile -f; bitbake virtual/kernel Can you tell me what the difference is between "bitbake virtual/kernel -c compile -f" and "bitbake virtual/kernel" Shouldn't be the last command "bitbake -c deploy virtual/kernel"? Thanks for the infos Regards Juergen --_000_A7B59F6D52627C44813C136D437B0832068BC78CB34ATKSSREX01ou_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Darren

You su= ggested in Bug 2256 the following:

$ bitbake virtual/kernel -c cleansstate

$ bitbake virtual/kernel = -c menuconfig

$ bitbake virtual/kernel -c compile -f; bitbake virtual/kernel

Can you tell me what the difference= is between

“bitbake virtual/kernel -c compile –f”

and

“bitbake virtual/kernel”

Shouldn’t be the last command “bitba= ke –c deploy virtual/kernel”?

Thanks for the infos

Regards

Juergen

= --_000_A7B59F6D52627C44813C136D437B0832068BC78CB34ATKSSREX01ou_-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A39BE01426 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:28:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Jun 2012 07:28:23 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="166124860" Received: from unknown (HELO envy.home) ([10.255.12.135]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Jun 2012 07:28:23 -0700 Message-ID: <4FDB463C.6020100@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:27:08 -0700 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?windows-1252?Q?J=FCrgen_Messerer?= References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Bug 2256 - kernel menuconfig confusion with sstate X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:28:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Juergen, On 06/15/2012 02:07 AM, Jürgen Messerer wrote: > Dear Darren > > You suggested in Bug 2256 the following: > > $ bitbake virtual/kernel -c cleansstate > > $ bitbake virtual/kernel -c menuconfig > > $ bitbake virtual/kernel -c compile -f; bitbake virtual/kernel > > Can you tell me what the difference is between > > “bitbake virtual/kernel -c compile –f” > > and > > “bitbake virtual/kernel” The -c argument specifies a specific task you want bitbake to execute, it accepts values from the listtasks command, compile is one of them. The -f argument forces the task to execute even if bitbake thinks it has already performed the task. This is useful when changing the sources manually, which bitbake can't know anything about. Note that "bitbake -h" would have provided this information. > > Shouldn’t be the last command “bitbake –c deploy virtual/kernel”? If all you want is to get the bzImage into the tmp/deploy/images directory, then that will suffice. If you want it to package it up and complete all the tasks associated with the virtual/kernel recipe, then "bitbake virtual/kernel" is required. > > Thanks for the infos Welcome. > > Regards > > Juergen -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel