From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Mailand Subject: Re: Unmountable btrfs filesystems Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:55:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4FDDE1DE.5030709@tuxadero.com> References: <4FDCD484.50706@widodh.nl> Reply-To: martin@tuxadero.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:60145 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757275Ab2FQNzo (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:55:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FDCD484.50706@widodh.nl> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Wido den Hollander Cc: ceph-devel Hi Wido, until recently there were still a few bugs in btrfs which could be hit quite easily with ceph. The last big one was fixed here http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-devel/msg06270.html I am running a ceph cluster with btrfs on a 3.5-rc2 without a problem, even under heavy test load. Hope that's helped. -martin Am 16.06.2012 20:46, schrieb Wido den Hollander: > I tried various kernels, the most recent 3.3.0 from kernel.ubuntu.com, > but I'm still seeing this. > > Is anyone seeing the same or did everybody migrate away to ext4 or XFS? > > I still prefer btrfs due to the snapshotting, but loosing all these > OSD's all the time is getting kind of frustrating. > > Any thoughts or comments?