From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wido den Hollander Subject: Re: Unmountable btrfs filesystems Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:30:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4FDEF542.3040704@widodh.nl> References: <4FDCD484.50706@widodh.nl> <4FDDE1DE.5030709@tuxadero.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp02.mail.pcextreme.nl ([109.72.87.138]:58777 "EHLO smtp02.mail.pcextreme.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752396Ab2FRJao (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2012 05:30:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FDDE1DE.5030709@tuxadero.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: martin@tuxadero.com Cc: ceph-devel Hi, On 06/17/2012 03:55 PM, Martin Mailand wrote: > Hi Wido, > until recently there were still a few bugs in btrfs which could be hit > quite easily with ceph. The last big one was fixed here > http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-devel/msg06270.html > > I am running a ceph cluster with btrfs on a 3.5-rc2 without a problem, > even under heavy test load. > I'll give that one a try, thanks! I've also let the btrfs tools like fsck loose on those filesystems, but they were beyond any repair. Al kinds of errors on the filesystems. Nothing wrong with the disk below them, but the filesystems were just completely broken, no way of repairing. Wido > Hope that's helped. > > -martin > > > Am 16.06.2012 20:46, schrieb Wido den Hollander: >> I tried various kernels, the most recent 3.3.0 from kernel.ubuntu.com, >> but I'm still seeing this. >> >> Is anyone seeing the same or did everybody migrate away to ext4 or XFS? >> >> I still prefer btrfs due to the snapshotting, but loosing all these >> OSD's all the time is getting kind of frustrating. >> >> Any thoughts or comments?