On 14.06.2012 00:42, Robert Mabee wrote:

> Having second thoughts.  Where I suggested taking out this call
> 
>> -      else if (isregexop (ch))
>> +      else if (ch == '*')    /* only wildcard currently implemented */
> I should have just taken the extraneous '.' out of isregexop.


It's used in other contexts as "needing escaping". So no, this part is fine

>  That would
> make it slightly simpler to add the remaining shell wildcards ('?' and '[')
> when desired.
> 
> '[' already works,

Not properly: try a[b*

> if there's also a * to trigger expansion, with the small
> bug that special chars within [] still get escaped or translated so the set
> may include an unexpected '.' or '\'.
> 
> Other regex chars also work, which probably should be counted as a
> bug.  I assume the eventual goal is to behave just like a common shell.

Please try attached patch
-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko