From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Hartkopp Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] CAN FD support Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:14:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4FDF7E10.9050301@hartkopp.net> References: <4FDF67B2.1090004@hartkopp.net> <4FDF7D0E.1000802@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.160]:58560 "EHLO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751388Ab2FRTOX (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:14:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FDF7D0E.1000802@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Marc Kleine-Budde Cc: "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" On 18.06.2012 21:10, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 06/18/2012 07:38 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: >> Hello Marc, >> >> here's my first real git patch series adding support for CAN with flexible >> data rate (CAN FD). >> >> As there were no new remarks to my RFC v5 from 2012-05-28 >> >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.can/1297 >> >> and it's tested and running on my machine for a while now it's IMHO time >> for net-next now. >> >> You can also pull the series ;-) > > I can pull, but David want's to have a clean tree. So I have to pull and > rebase it on my tree. I created a branch 'canfd' on a clone of *your* can-next. What's not clean there? You can pull Daves net-next and then pull the canfd branch, right? > >> Git is hard for newbies but i gave my very best ... > > Once you can use it, you don't want to code without it. Yes - it's getting better. Indeed it looks like Thunderbird mangles the mails when editing the draft mails. Regards, Oliver