From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Mick Subject: Re: RBD layering design draft Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:10:40 -0700 Message-ID: <4FDFB570.2040300@inktank.com> References: <4FDB9FBB.9000807@inktank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:61490 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753075Ab2FRXKn (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:10:43 -0400 Received: by dady13 with SMTP id y13so7569282dad.19 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:10:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Tommi Virtanen Cc: Sage Weil , Josh Durgin , ceph-devel On 06/18/2012 09:25 AM, Tommi Virtanen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Sage Weil wrote: >> Is 'preserve' and 'unpreserve' the verbiage we want to use here? Not sure >> I have a better suggestion, but preserve is unusual. > > protect/unprotect? The flag protects the image snapshot from being deleted. unremovable/removable? undeletable/deletable?