From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qc0-f175.google.com ([209.85.216.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SgqVk-0007JD-2t for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 06:57:52 +0200 Received: by qcso7 with SMTP id o7so3185769qcs.6 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:47:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fWnyDjOY/zvfCeS61JTn9TjUChfMzbO6RuEYLly4IdI=; b=TZHUdUF46ZZUTZha6i8IYlTZ3SzhDuq74JOSTJfqZiL71Lqd276LoC2jhfCc7ZkG6S GL+9qXLd4xjT3CH547262PN3Bcfl7PXFDj2wohpOc4C6b/6Pg8kc1pwYNsukvYziS5Bj 8g9T8BmzJNUEfr1iPy8QamHLyIOzSABJmuJa01zxkalrdaEYv1jdulVhWu3zmtppOK1F JgCJgJWCnykmfOyQDf+84tip3KmmOncqbiqxpLSJ/dM0FKXBEQcjntJqGefjQn2KV+H1 38RTJU4lCWSkgeXfBgZMdoI5RYS7bHaujgaoF0aIIa88vUq7dDxWgr5QLSJiYE3QK0jb RgJg== Received: by 10.229.137.145 with SMTP id w17mr398253qct.27.1340081228813; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (dpc693570121.direcpc.com. [69.35.70.121]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x14sm35896231qac.1.2012.06.18.21.47.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FE00430.2070307@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:46:40 -0700 From: j User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120616 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <7888297.NxAaM4fFbI@pink> <4FE00142.30908@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Package selection X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 04:57:52 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/18/2012 09:40 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:34 PM, j wrote: >>> Also, you need to bitbake -c cleanall to make bitbake >>> forget it >> >> Isnt bitbake -c cleansstate a better method of cleaning a >> build you want to do again? >> >> If not does anyone know what the actual difference is? > clean - cleans the builddir > cleansstate - cleans builddir as well as shared state copy of this > package if any > cleanall - clean builddir, shared state and the downloaded src tar > file from DL_DIR > > you usually only should need clean in general. cleansstate should be seldom used > but its preferred to see why cleansstate is needed and if there is > anything wrong > with sstate we would like to know. > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel Thanks Khem, been wondering that info just had not looked into it as of yet. Makes perfect sense now.