From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laxman Dewangan Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: support for regulator match by regulator-compatible Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:36:09 +0530 Message-ID: <4FE06B31.3050306@nvidia.com> References: <1340085087-6608-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1340085087-6608-2-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <20120619093211.GB3974@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FE04788.5040008@nvidia.com> <20120619104254.GD3974@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120619104254.GD3974@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: "lrg@ti.com" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , "swarren@wwwdotorg.org" , "sameo@linux.intel.com" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 19 June 2012 04:13 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:04:00PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >> Agree. Currently following regulators are using this (based on grep) >> mfd/tps6586x.c >> regulator/ab8500.c >> regulator/db8500-prcmu.c >> and regulator/tps65910. > > I've no concerns with the interface or the code itself other than the > usability issue with partial deployment so if you could do the updates > for the other drivers that'd be great. I'll hold off on applying this > until we've got everything else updated. Mark, Just thinking on optimizing the changes require, we can do it in 3 patches only: - In place of adding new api of_regulator_match_by_compatible(), we can modify the existing of_regulator_match() itself to look for regulator-compatible for matching. This can be done in first patch. - Need not to change the .c files, here just change the documentation of these regulator dt binding. All can be done in second patch. - Change the dts file to have this policy and seeing only on arm/boot/dts/db8500.dtsi for ab8500 and db8500-prcmu. So it will be third patch . We will not need any change on above c files as the api is not going to change. Require your opinion.